Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Leslie Rose

Rheumatology Denver, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1871649400 CMS profile 1071315

1055 Clermont St (111G), Denver, CO 80020

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,872

583 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Leslie Rose of Denver, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,872 across 583 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 73rd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,571 123
2024 General $1,698 84
2023 General $1,740 79
2022 General $414 22
2021 General $688 32
2020 General $997 61
2019 General $2,765 182

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Leslie Rose
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Leslie Rose were reported at $2,571. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Leslie Rose Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,765 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $997 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $688 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $414 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,740 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,698 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,571 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $2,194 144 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,101 56 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,033 74 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $995 49 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $697 31 payments
  6. Inari Medical, Inc. $529 4 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $472 24 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $427 28 payments
  9. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $401 21 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $393 23 payments
  11. Other $2,629 129 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,734 574 payments
  2. Education $138 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XELJANZ $905 66 payments
  2. Otezla $890 50 payments
  3. FLOWTRIEVER CATHETER, S $765 6 payments
  4. SAPHNELO $672 30 payments
  5. Bimzelx $533 26 payments
  6. RINVOQ $468 25 payments
  7. Cimzia $462 23 payments
  8. KRYSTEXXA $440 22 payments
  9. TALTZ $414 26 payments
  10. Enbrel $398 22 payments
  11. Other $7,508 423 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

1,372

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,024,658

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

23.2%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 44 $416,220
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 33 $218,373
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 15 $117,559
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 11 $81,816
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 12 $77,291
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 13 $73,984
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 347 $15,012
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 113 $4,494
Cevimeline Hcl Generic 33 $2,846
Prednisone Generic 271 $2,256

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 42 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,126,150

Of which drugs: $1,030,992

Medicare patients

362

Average age 74

Services billed

96,759

287 women, 75 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 61%
Osteoporosis 40%
Depression 27%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
COPD 18%
Diabetes 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 30 6,400 $216,586
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 26 43,920 $206,688
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 68 6,820 $170,034
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 53 5,280 $108,042
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 32 8,581 $77,779
Injection, cetirizine hydrochloride, 0.5 mg J1201 Office 32 1,540 $17,832
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 18 2,206 $225
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 106 196 $101
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 14 238 $56
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 12 68 $52

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $200
$200 13 —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $195
$195 33 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $167
$167 — —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $136
$136 — —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $118
$118 26 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

583 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record