Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Leeza Patel

Rheumatology Erie, PA Medical Doctor

NPI 1881034841 CMS profile 4681356

3317 Liberty St, Erie, PA 16508

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,846

625 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Leeza Patel of Erie, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,846 across 625 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,801 99
2024 General $1,935 110
2023 General $3,110 138
2022 General $1,960 93
2021 General $1,032 60
2020 General $683 49
2019 General $1,326 76

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Leeza Patel
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Leeza Patel were reported at $2,801. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Leeza Patel Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,326 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $683 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,032 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,960 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,110 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,935 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,801 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $3,494 206 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,081 103 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,660 94 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $1,510 69 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $920 11 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $603 39 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $498 28 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $472 21 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $347 12 payments
  10. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $268 3 payments
  11. Other $994 39 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,077 624 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $769 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $2,953 152 payments
  2. SIMPONI ARIA $2,279 144 payments
  3. RINVOQ $1,244 62 payments
  4. Cimzia $1,239 56 payments
  5. Otezla $1,054 43 payments
  6. Enbrel Inflammation $917 43 payments
  7. STELARA $774 55 payments
  8. XELJANZ $572 37 payments
  9. BENLYSTA $472 21 payments
  10. Enbrel Inflammation $368 18 payments
  11. Other $4,116 224 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 45 drugs

Part D claims

3,718

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,269,792

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

31.9%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 79 $581,518
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 34 $373,559
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 34 $336,084
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 13 $211,743
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 17 $115,198
Orencia Abatacept Brand 20 $106,095
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 25 $90,290
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 16 $89,526
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 12 $88,271
Otezla Apremilast Brand 14 $66,167

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 45 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,473,085

Of which drugs: $1,356,243

Medicare patients

465

Average age 74

Services billed

165,427

324 women, 141 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 74%
Osteoporosis 29%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Depression 23%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 23 13,100 $443,423
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 28 94,000 $338,832
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 56 5,520 $113,321
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 21 2,242 $228

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$410 — —
RINVOQ
$305 — —
Enbrel
$203 46 —
XELJANZ
$162 — —
Cimzia
$123 — 94,000

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

625 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record