Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lee Matlock

Nurse Practitioner, Family Tulsa, OK Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1467990820 CMS profile 10918224

6160 S Yale Ave, Tulsa, OK 74136

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,716

772 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lee Matlock of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,716 across 772 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,642 181
2024 General $4,216 208
2023 General $4,008 215
2022 General $2,378 136
2021 General $472 32

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lee Matlock
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lee Matlock were reported at $3,642. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Lee Matlock Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $472 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $2,378 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $4,008 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $4,216 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $3,642 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,164 194 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,470 149 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,508 74 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $1,247 55 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $867 30 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $755 40 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $691 35 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $587 18 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $500 20 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $417 21 payments
  11. Other $2,511 136 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,402 768 payments
  2. Education $314 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,649 161 payments
  2. SAPHNELO $1,417 69 payments
  3. Enbrel $1,300 64 payments
  4. Otezla $1,143 58 payments
  5. SKYRIZI $831 66 payments
  6. Cimzia $708 34 payments
  7. TREMFYA $666 22 payments
  8. COSENTYX $632 33 payments
  9. XELJANZ $624 32 payments
  10. ACTHAR $587 18 payments
  11. Other $6,993 371 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

2,359

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$1,558,377

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

30%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 42 $455,761
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 45 $320,746
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 39 $244,064
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 37 $215,521
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 16 $92,467
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 14 $78,013
Humira Adalimumab Brand 11 $74,626
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 444 $25,866
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 340 $12,683
Leflunomide Generic 146 $11,544

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$43,687

Of which drugs: $361

Medicare patients

446

Average age 71

Services billed

2,466

348 women, 98 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 35%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Diabetes 26%
Osteoporosis 25%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
COPD 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 51 298 $199
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 16 1,360 $140

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $640
$640 39 —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $344
$344 — —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $303
$303 45 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $250
$250 — —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $246
$246 53 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

772 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Oklahoma

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record