Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lauren McDonald

Nephrology Dallas, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1366413288 CMS profile 334349

411 N Washington Ave, Suite 7000, Dallas, TX 75246

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$49,778

129 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lauren McDonald of Dallas, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $49,778 across 129 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $47,934 70
2024 General $646 20
2023 General $612 13
2022 General $140 7
2020 General $35 2
2019 General $411 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lauren McDonald
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lauren McDonald were reported at $47,934. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Lauren McDonald Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $411 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $35 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $0 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $140 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $612 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $646 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $47,934 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $41,481 65 payments
  2. Calliditas Therapeutics US Inc. $4,625 3 payments
  3. Genentech USA, Inc. $1,832 1 payment
  4. Horizon Therapeutics plc $493 7 payments
  5. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $148 6 payments
  6. Shield Therapeutics Inc $146 2 payments
  7. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $116 3 payments
  8. Relypsa, Inc. $113 5 payments
  9. Genentech, Inc. $110 1 payment
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $94 5 payments
  11. Other $620 31 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $38,000 16 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $6,302 2 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $3,172 93 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $2,236 16 payments
  5. Education $68 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KRYSTEXXA Inflammation/Rare Disease $35,541 57 payments
  2. TARPEYO $4,625 3 payments
  3. GAZYVA $1,832 1 payment
  4. KRYSTEXXA Krystexxa $493 7 payments
  5. ACCRUFER $146 2 payments
  6. LUPKYNIS $116 3 payments
  7. Xofluza $110 1 payment
  8. BENLYSTA $82 4 payments
  9. Kerendia $76 4 payments
  10. Veltassa $73 3 payments
  11. Other $694 34 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

433

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$157,622

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

28.2%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Velphoro Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide Brand 46 $110,594
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 23 $16,984
Sevelamer Carbonate Generic 66 $16,712
Lokelma Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Brand 18 $6,700
Calcium Acetate Generic 11 $1,500
Nifedipine Er Nifedipine Brand 35 $1,338
Clonidine Generic 11 $1,268
Potassium Chloride Generic 40 $1,039
Hydralazine Hcl Generic 24 $379
Amlodipine Besylate Generic 29 $219

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 31 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$165,436

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

296

Average age 72

Services billed

3,426

153 women, 143 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Heart failure 63%
Arthritis 60%
Ischemic heart disease 52%
Depression 42%
Atrial fibrillation 39%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $141
$141 — —
LUPKYNIS
  • Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $96
$96 — —
IBSRELA
  • Ardelyx, Inc. $29
$29 — —
Veltassa
  • Relypsa, Inc. $27
$27 — —
Velphoro
  • Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. $26
$26 46 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

129 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nephrology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record