Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Laura Omalley

Internal Medicine Phoenix, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1366402216 CMS profile 885576

3333 E Camelback Rd Ste 122, Phoenix, AZ 85018

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,242

732 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Laura Omalley of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,242 across 732 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,228 71
2024 General $1,942 105
2023 General $2,185 145
2022 General $2,066 122
2021 General $1,283 90
2020 General $977 69
2019 General $1,561 130

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Laura Omalley
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Laura Omalley were reported at $1,228. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Laura Omalley Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,561 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $977 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,283 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,066 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,185 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,942 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,228 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,404 192 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,602 101 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,292 103 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $606 33 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $538 35 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $508 40 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $439 20 payments
  8. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $395 22 payments
  9. Allergan Inc. $286 34 payments
  10. Amarin Pharma Inc. $201 6 payments
  11. Other $2,971 146 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,222 729 payments
  2. Education $21 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $919 75 payments
  2. EVENITY $805 49 payments
  3. Ozempic $804 63 payments
  4. Prolia $773 51 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $660 47 payments
  6. QULIPTA $553 60 payments
  7. AIMOVIG $468 33 payments
  8. Repatha $457 32 payments
  9. XIFAXAN $395 22 payments
  10. LINZESS $393 27 payments
  11. Other $8,956 572 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 68 drugs

Part D claims

1,970

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$199,573

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

16.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 32 $42,394
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 13 $25,338
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 19 $23,341
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 12 $21,889
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 15 $14,212
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 23 $13,525
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 20 $12,742
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 12 $7,213
Repatha Syringe Evolocumab Brand 12 $6,520
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 131 $3,064

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 68 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 82 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$135,558

Of which drugs: $20,115

Medicare patients

295

Average age 76

Services billed

5,770

238 women, 57 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 57%
Arthritis 45%
Osteoporosis 31%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Cancer 13%
Diabetes 12%
Depression 10%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Sarscov2 vac 50 mcg/0.5ml im 91322 Office 51 58 $8,368
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 18 18 $4,942
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 54 54 $4,418
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 26 26 $2,108

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$197 20 —
VOQUEZNA
$155 — —
UBRELVY
$154 — —
ZAVZPRET
$120 — —
RYBELSUS
$98 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

732 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record