Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kyle Groom

Family Medicine De Kalb, TX Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1063413656 CMS profile 183686

216 N Centre St, De Kalb, TX 75559

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,686

105 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$67,075 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Kyle Groom of De Kalb, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,686 across 105 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $67,075 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 77th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $202 10
2024 General $299 15
2023 General $233 13
2022 General $125 8
2021 General $279 22
2020 General $421 28
2019 General $127 9

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kyle Groom
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kyle Groom were reported at $202. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Kyle Groom Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $127 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $421 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $279 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $125 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $233 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $299 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $202 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $280 17 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $235 17 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $183 11 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $159 11 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $156 11 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $106 7 payments
  7. ITI, Inc. $91 4 payments
  8. Abbott Laboratories $88 4 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $62 4 payments
  10. Genentech USA, Inc. $52 3 payments
  11. Other $274 16 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,686 105 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $263 16 payments
  2. UBRELVY $133 8 payments
  3. EMGALITY $127 9 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $106 7 payments
  5. PAXLOVID $100 5 payments
  6. CAPLYTA $91 4 payments
  7. Ozempic $87 6 payments
  8. EUCRISA $83 6 payments
  9. COLOGUARD $83 6 payments
  10. QULIPTA $80 5 payments
  11. Other $1,174 75 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

389

Median for Emergency Medicine: 88

Drug cost

$3,533

Median for Emergency Medicine: $590

Branded share of claims

13.6%

Median for Emergency Medicine: 33.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 19 $622
Quetiapine Fumarate Generic 12 $368
Potassium Chloride Generic 19 $285
Azithromycin Generic 38 $283
Clindamycin Hcl Generic 25 $221
Ondansetron Odt Ondansetron Brand 16 $215
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 30 $188
Losartan Potassium Generic 15 $180
Cefdinir Generic 11 $180
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 18 $165

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 40,243 Part D prescribers listed as Emergency Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 63 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$292,220

Of which drugs: $534

Medicare patients

385

Average age 72

Services billed

6,437

200 women, 185 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 45%
Diabetes 35%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
COPD 29%
Heart failure 26%
Depression 26%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 15 15 $329
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 40 200 $118
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 51 549 $37
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 21 106 $30

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
PAXLOVID
  • PFIZER INC. $83
$83 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $31
$31 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $21
$21 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $21
$21 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $20
$20 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

105 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record