Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kimberly Green

Hematology & Oncology Charlotte, NC Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1447424197 CMS profile 1257879

125 Queens Rd Ste 600, Charlotte, NC 28204

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,395

246 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$917,789 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Kimberly Green of Charlotte, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,395 across 246 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $917,789 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 70th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $273 2
2024 General $1,941 15
2023 General $879 8
2022 General $244 3
2021 General $2,040 5
2020 General $686 33
2019 General $3,331 180

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kimberly Green
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kimberly Green were reported at $273. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Kimberly Green Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,331 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $686 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $2,040 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $244 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $879 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $1,941 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $273 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. $1,984 2 payments
  2. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $1,225 2 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $683 8 payments
  4. Incyte Corporation $586 8 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $584 36 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $499 24 payments
  7. Abiomed $483 10 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $350 24 payments
  9. Celgene Corporation $312 9 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $285 19 payments
  11. Other $2,404 104 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,758 232 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $3,025 2 payments
  3. Gift $439 9 payments
  4. Education $173 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XPOVIO $1,984 2 payments
  2. TECVAYLI $1,225 2 payments
  3. JAKAFI $501 7 payments
  4. Impella $483 10 payments
  5. ELITEK $256 3 payments
  6. KEYTRUDA $243 16 payments
  7. PROMACTA $201 14 payments
  8. OPDIVO $195 15 payments
  9. TECENTRIQ $160 12 payments
  10. TASIGNA $152 11 payments
  11. Other $5,287 269 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

893

Median for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: 228

Drug cost

$3,091,633

Median for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: $852,602

Branded share of claims

31.7%

Median for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: 38.4%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xospata Gilteritinib Fumarate Brand 28 $653,058
Rezurock Belumosudil Mesylate Brand 18 $635,567
Ojjaara Momelotinib Dihydrochloride Brand 26 $616,084
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 30 $466,154
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 19 $393,127
Cresemba Isavuconazonium Sulfate Brand 17 $106,164
Plerixafor Generic 22 $84,274
Venclexta Venetoclax Brand 28 $84,092
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 13 $20,227
Posaconazole Generic 17 $15,061

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 130 Part D prescribers listed as Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 23 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$59,507

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

262

Average age 72

Services billed

763

109 women, 153 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 55%
Chronic kidney disease 42%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Heart failure 31%
Diabetes 28%
Atrial fibrillation 25%
Depression 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TECVAYLI
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $1,175
$1,175 — —
ABECMA
  • Celgene Corporation $92
$92 — —
DARZALEX
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $25
$25 — —
TALVEY
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $25
$25 — —
Pedmark
  • Fennec Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $22
$22 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

246 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record