Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kimberley Wilson

Rheumatology Atlanta, GA Medical Doctor

NPI 1699852814 CMS profile 348891

2001 Peachtree Rd, Suite 205, Atlanta, GA 30309

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$40,756

1,640 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kimberley Wilson of Atlanta, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $40,756 across 1,640 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $7,362 242
2024 General $6,652 271
2023 General $9,003 314
2022 General $5,282 224
2021 General $3,736 161
2020 General $3,645 183
2019 General $5,075 245

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kimberley Wilson
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kimberley Wilson were reported at $7,362. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Kimberley Wilson Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $5,075 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $3,645 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $3,736 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $5,282 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $9,003 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $6,652 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $7,362 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $7,174 150 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $6,938 253 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $5,118 236 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $3,178 179 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $3,159 212 payments
  6. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $1,677 42 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $1,392 65 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,368 53 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $1,326 87 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,138 54 payments
  11. Other $8,288 309 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $36,750 1,624 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $3,615 2 payments
  3. Education $391 14 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $6,401 112 payments
  2. RINVOQ $3,642 112 payments
  3. Cimzia $2,188 137 payments
  4. COSENTYX Dermatology $1,678 119 payments
  5. ACTHAR $1,677 42 payments
  6. SIMPONI ARIA $1,651 62 payments
  7. COSENTYX Immunology $1,564 98 payments
  8. HUMIRA $1,517 69 payments
  9. SAPHNELO $1,305 50 payments
  10. XELJANZ $1,249 81 payments
  11. Other $21,626 998 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 80 drugs

Part D claims

3,790

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$402,955

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

15.2%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 16 $112,914
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 12 $71,791
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 13 $61,647
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 12 $20,807
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 13 $16,434
Ambrisentan Generic 12 $15,200
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 337 $13,001
Cyclosporine Generic 28 $9,150
Cevimeline Hcl Generic 40 $6,554
Mitigare Colchicine Brand 14 $4,811

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 80 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$119,165

Of which drugs: $25,884

Medicare patients

456

Average age 74

Services billed

21,739

373 women, 83 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 71%
Osteoporosis 31%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Depression 25%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Diabetes 21%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 134 18,681 $1,857
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 13 13 $469
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 73 608 $434
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 31 60 $378
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 34 54 $201
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 24 128 $70

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 36 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$743 12 —
TREMFYA
$739 — —
COSENTYX
$607 — —
KRYSTEXXA
$435 — —
Enbrel
$325 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 36 with Patron

Records

1,640 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record