Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kim Tyler

Rheumatology Denver, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1275753717 CMS profile 329735

7111 E Lowry Blvd Ste 200, Ste 200, Denver, CO 80230

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,442

258 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kim Tyler of Denver, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,442 across 258 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 59th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $465 27
2024 General $390 18
2023 General $618 30
2022 General $1,140 69
2021 General $782 41
2020 General $240 13
2019 General $807 60

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kim Tyler
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kim Tyler were reported at $465. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Kim Tyler Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $807 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $240 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $782 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,140 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $618 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $390 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $465 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $956 46 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $808 50 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $417 31 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $388 26 payments
  5. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $305 28 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $278 14 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $216 8 payments
  8. Genentech USA, Inc. $205 10 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $161 7 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $132 6 payments
  11. Other $576 32 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,399 254 payments
  2. Education $43 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BENLYSTA $781 49 payments
  2. RINVOQ $446 21 payments
  3. XELJANZ $325 21 payments
  4. PURIFIED CORTROPHIN GEL $278 27 payments
  5. ORENCIA $278 14 payments
  6. HUMIRA $258 15 payments
  7. Actemra $187 9 payments
  8. COSENTYX Dermatology $185 13 payments
  9. COSENTYX Immunology $184 16 payments
  10. SKYRIZI $166 6 payments
  11. Other $2,008 100 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 40 drugs

Part D claims

2,296

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,650,808

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

28.6%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 75 $692,459
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 50 $516,458
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 29 $217,096
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 26 $87,450
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 11 $70,852
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 297 $14,111
Rasuvo Methotrexate/Pf Brand 12 $11,648
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 287 $6,612
Leflunomide Generic 73 $4,615
Sulfasalazine Dr Sulfasalazine Brand 54 $3,084

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 40 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 75 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,710,642

Of which drugs: $1,545,358

Medicare patients

567

Average age 74

Services billed

130,548

446 women, 121 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 57%
Osteoporosis 54%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Depression 22%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Diabetes 14%
COPD 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 60 10,875 $360,903
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 25 47,520 $223,396
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 119 9,180 $188,913
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 46 7,300 $182,057
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 33 15,750 $141,742
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 25 10,710 $91,613
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 20 20 $1,636
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 28 140 $626
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 193 531 $270
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 20 216 $168

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $103
$103 — —
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $94
$94 — —
Arcalyst
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $42
$42 — —
ILARIS
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $28
$28 — —
TAVNEOS
  • Amgen Inc. $26
$26 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

258 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record