Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kevin Varden

Internal Medicine Mobile, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1417903113 CMS profile 154476

1700 Springhill Ave, Suite 100, Mobile, AL 36604

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,403

1,353 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kevin Varden of Mobile, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,403 across 1,353 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,660 123
2024 General $1,429 117
2023 General $1,961 151
2022 General $2,784 216
2021 General $3,351 264
2020 General $2,404 205
2019 General $2,815 277

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kevin Varden
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kevin Varden were reported at $1,660. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Kevin Varden Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,815 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,404 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,351 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,784 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,961 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,429 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,660 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,559 202 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,012 181 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,295 140 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $998 84 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $942 72 payments
  6. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $940 109 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $744 54 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $722 44 payments
  9. Amarin Pharma Inc. $703 105 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $681 46 payments
  11. Other $4,806 316 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,274 1,346 payments
  2. Education $128 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,647 142 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,469 119 payments
  3. UBRELVY $1,002 65 payments
  4. XARELTO $886 105 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $806 65 payments
  6. Kerendia $722 44 payments
  7. EVENITY $671 66 payments
  8. VRAYLAR $628 49 payments
  9. Prolia $587 61 payments
  10. QULIPTA $586 36 payments
  11. Other $13,040 1,114 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 275 drugs

Part D claims

35,354

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$2,525,556

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

21.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 329 $338,322
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 419 $275,784
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 185 $156,051
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 113 $130,801
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 144 $121,996
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 161 $99,606
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 74 $85,330
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 95 $85,096
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 72 $68,301
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 48 $65,370

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 275 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 147 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$337,936

Of which drugs: $51,185

Medicare patients

1,038

Average age 79

Services billed

16,369

634 women, 404 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Diabetes 29%
Atrial fibrillation 27%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Heart failure 22%
Depression 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 19 1,680 $33,597
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 116 116 $9,491
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 23 23 $6,635
Influenza virus vaccine, quadrivalent (aiiv4), inactivated, adjuvanted, preservative free, for injection into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90694 Office 12 12 $910
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 17 46 $34

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
$158 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$136 72 —
RYBELSUS
$134 48 —
Ozempic
$134 329 —
VRAYLAR
$110 21 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

1,353 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record