Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kenneth Smith

Internal Medicine Chesterfield, MI Medical Doctor

NPI 1962409961 CMS profile 134062

30795 23 Mile Rd Ste 201, Chesterfield, MI 48047

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,681

614 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kenneth Smith of Chesterfield, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,681 across 614 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,612 87
2024 General $1,857 103
2023 General $1,189 74
2022 General $1,320 85
2021 General $1,382 92
2020 General $487 35
2019 General $1,834 138

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kenneth Smith
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kenneth Smith were reported at $1,612. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Kenneth Smith Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,834 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $487 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,382 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,320 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,189 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,857 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,612 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,160 66 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,138 81 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $853 50 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $743 53 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $724 51 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $707 46 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $621 41 payments
  8. Exact Sciences Corporation $429 22 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $362 24 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $281 21 payments
  11. Other $2,663 159 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,643 610 payments
  2. Education $38 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $706 40 payments
  2. Ozempic $590 41 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $533 36 payments
  4. JARDIANCE $394 27 payments
  5. Cologuard Collection Kit $367 18 payments
  6. UBRELVY $360 26 payments
  7. SPIRIVA RESPIMAT $327 17 payments
  8. MOUNJARO $323 22 payments
  9. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $321 21 payments
  10. Prolia $307 20 payments
  11. Other $9,292 605 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 145 drugs

Part D claims

8,480

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,035,985

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

25.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 120 $143,480
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 118 $138,623
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 96 $111,813
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 57 $93,305
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 41 $56,195
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 47 $47,701
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 20 $37,873
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 37 $37,844
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 46 $36,690
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 19 $25,690

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 145 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 56 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$68,488

Of which drugs: $30,589

Medicare patients

244

Average age 75

Services billed

3,245

137 women, 107 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 62%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Diabetes 34%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
COPD 32%
Depression 25%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 13 1,320 $26,869
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 33 34 $2,531

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $199
$199 41 —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $86
  • Lilly USA, LLC $72
$159 120 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $106
$106 96 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $100
$100 — —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $98
$98 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

614 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record