Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kenneth Beer

Dermatology West Palm Beach, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1699764993 CMS profile 303568

1500 N Dixie Hwy, Suite 305, West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$63,267

240 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,929

Paid to them · 3 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,754,073 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Kenneth Beer of West Palm Beach, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $63,267 across 240 general payments and $1,929 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,754,073 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,047 48
2025 Research $429 1
2024 General $8,706 48
2023 General $628 32
2022 General $645 24
2021 General $14,700 40
2020 General $20,991 22
2019 General $16,551 26
2019 Research $1,500 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kenneth Beer
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kenneth Beer were reported at $1,047. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Kenneth Beer Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $16,551 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $20,991 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $14,700 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $645 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $628 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $8,706 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $1,047 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Allergan Inc. $33,068 47 payments
  2. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $19,454 69 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $8,959 56 payments
  4. Revance Therapeutics, Inc. $227 2 payments
  5. Incyte Corporation $191 9 payments
  6. Merz North America, Inc. $168 7 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $147 1 payment
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $147 6 payments
  9. LEO Pharma Inc. $143 8 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $134 5 payments
  11. Other $630 30 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $58,635 23 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $4,624 216 payments
  3. Education $8 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BOTOX $12,175 39 payments
  2. BOTOX COSMETIC $5,398 18 payments
  3. DAXXIFY $227 2 payments
  4. DYSPORT $217 19 payments
  5. DYSPORT $185 15 payments
  6. OPZELURA $174 8 payments
  7. DUPIXENT $147 1 payment
  8. SPEVIGO $147 6 payments
  9. SKYRIZI Immunology $132 10 payments
  10. SKYRIZI Immunology $95 6 payments
  11. Other $948 47 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bausch Health US, LLC $1,500 2 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $429 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 14 drugs

Part D claims

457

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$10,282

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

3.1%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 96 $2,459
Calcipotriene Generic 13 $1,609
Fluorouracil Generic 25 $1,419
Mometasone Furoate Generic 63 $1,066
Tretinoin Generic 20 $1,050
Mupirocin Generic 85 $641
Gentamicin Sulfate Generic 19 $494
Ketoconazole Generic 33 $348
Minocycline Hcl Generic 18 $334
Cephalexin Generic 26 $239

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 14 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 56 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$318,667

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

933

Average age 79

Services billed

5,658

414 women, 519 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Diabetes 24%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Cancer 21%
Osteoporosis 21%
Chronic kidney disease 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DYSPORT
  • Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $190
$190 — —
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $147
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $31
$178 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $95
$95 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $83
$83 — —
SPEVIGO
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $70
$70 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

243 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record