Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kayur Patel

Rheumatology Schaumburg, IL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1831333855 CMS profile 672125

80 W Hillcrest Blvd Ste 208, Schaumburg, IL 60195

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,714

554 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kayur Patel of Schaumburg, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,714 across 554 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,406 109
2024 General $2,583 95
2023 General $3,317 133
2022 General $2,586 132
2021 General $1,663 82
2020 General $68 1
2019 General $92 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kayur Patel
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kayur Patel were reported at $2,406. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Kayur Patel Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $92 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $68 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,663 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,586 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,317 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,583 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,406 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,862 80 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,601 82 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,145 47 payments
  4. Horizon Therapeutics plc $1,054 39 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $990 45 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $944 36 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $793 43 payments
  8. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $544 12 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $502 25 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $467 19 payments
  11. Other $2,812 126 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,561 548 payments
  2. Education $154 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,120 64 payments
  2. KRYSTEXXA Krystexxa $1,011 37 payments
  3. SIMPONI ARIA $899 40 payments
  4. KRYSTEXXA Inflammation/Rare Disease $811 28 payments
  5. XELJANZ $756 42 payments
  6. Cimzia $590 21 payments
  7. COSENTYX $542 19 payments
  8. TALTZ $502 25 payments
  9. BENLYSTA $467 19 payments
  10. PURIFIED CORTROPHIN GEL $424 7 payments
  11. Other $7,277 335 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

1,516

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$729,919

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

24.1%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 53 $379,786
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 11 $106,524
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 14 $88,510
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 13 $74,266
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 11 $53,821
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 220 $5,540
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 125 $4,256
Celecoxib Generic 93 $2,858
Leflunomide Generic 40 $2,436
Prednisone Generic 346 $2,322

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$642,551

Of which drugs: $546,718

Medicare patients

256

Average age 73

Services billed

51,917

188 women, 68 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Osteoporosis 39%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Depression 21%
Diabetes 20%
Heart failure 18%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 45 20,860 $188,919
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 16 5,325 $180,396
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 24 1,800 $36,596

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $345
$345 — —
PURIFIED CORTROPHIN GEL
  • ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $344
$344 — —
SIMPONI ARIA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $168
$168 — 20,860
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $129
$129 13 —
OCTAGAM IMMUNE GLOBULIN (HUMAN)
  • Octapharma USA, Inc. $72
  • HOSPIRA, INC. $51
$123 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

554 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record