Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kacie Kline

Physician Assistant Los Angeles, CA Physician Assistant

NPI 1942924907 CMS profile 11400757

420 E 3Rd St Ste 805, Los Angeles, CA 90013

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$24,185

850 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kacie Kline of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $24,185 across 850 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $8,748 262
2024 General $7,480 304
2023 General $7,143 261
2022 General $814 23

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kacie Kline
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kacie Kline were reported at $8,748. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Kacie Kline Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $0 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $814 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $7,143 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $7,480 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $8,748 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $6,472 280 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $3,103 46 payments
  3. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $2,099 50 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $1,836 40 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,271 50 payments
  6. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $1,182 31 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $1,158 35 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $1,120 99 payments
  9. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,091 26 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $990 44 payments
  11. Other $3,864 149 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $20,909 841 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $2,925 2 payments
  3. Education $197 3 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $133 1 payment
  5. Travel and Lodging $22 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. RINVOQ $3,386 150 payments
  2. CIBINQO $3,103 46 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Immunology $2,654 60 payments
  4. SKYRIZI Immunology $2,044 84 payments
  5. Zoryve $1,669 36 payments
  6. VTAMA $1,301 34 payments
  7. SOTYKTU $1,236 48 payments
  8. SKYRIZI Immunology $1,108 46 payments
  9. Bimzelx $953 79 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $883 18 payments
  11. Other $6,834 297 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

597

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$868,536

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

27.6%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 18 $361,222
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 26 $172,540
Otezla Apremilast Brand 20 $98,277
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 23 $83,869
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 33 $65,529
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 11 $39,628
Vtama Tapinarof Brand 15 $19,768
Zoryve Roflumilast Brand 19 $15,519
Fluocinonide Generic 111 $4,795
Ammonium Lactate Generic 71 $1,459

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 20 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$8,807

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

64

Average age 71

Services billed

165

36 women, 28 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 64%
Arthritis 41%
Diabetes 39%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
COPD 19%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SKYRIZI
$961 18 —
RINVOQ
$886 — —
DUPIXENT
$783 34 —
VTAMA
$718 15 —
Zoryve
$670 19 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

850 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record