Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Julie Yip

Rheumatology Milford, CT Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1053670646 CMS profile 1343545

326 West Main St., Unit 106, Milford, CT 06460

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,325

419 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Julie Yip of Milford, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,325 across 419 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 68th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,930 87
2024 General $1,741 80
2023 General $1,269 53
2022 General $1,702 83
2021 General $48 3
2020 General $345 17
2019 General $1,290 96

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Julie Yip
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Julie Yip were reported at $1,930. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Julie Yip Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,290 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $345 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $48 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,702 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,269 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,741 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,930 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,770 98 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $1,268 62 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,155 72 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $752 28 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $533 34 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $432 19 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $416 25 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $305 8 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $227 8 payments
  10. Radius Health, Inc. $214 8 payments
  11. Other $1,251 57 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,083 414 payments
  2. Education $242 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Cimzia $1,037 49 payments
  2. RINVOQ $984 52 payments
  3. TREMFYA $598 15 payments
  4. XELJANZ $533 34 payments
  5. TALTZ $415 24 payments
  6. SAPHNELO $403 18 payments
  7. Enbrel $400 17 payments
  8. KEVZARA $392 11 payments
  9. SKYRIZI $322 20 payments
  10. Otezla $282 13 payments
  11. Other $3,748 212 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 41 drugs

Part D claims

2,799

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,755,386

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

20.4%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 79 $595,540
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 14 $300,418
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 34 $291,905
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 12 $168,130
Actemra Tocilizumab Brand 25 $102,911
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 11 $85,837
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 15 $81,804
Orencia Abatacept/Maltose Brand 11 $46,982
Prolia Denosumab Brand 18 $31,176
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 333 $10,624

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 41 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 26 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$365,621

Of which drugs: $310,624

Medicare patients

208

Average age 74

Services billed

31,993

166 women, 42 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 27%
Diabetes 26%
Depression 24%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 19 121 $62
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 16 28 $20

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cimzia
  • UCB, Inc. $209
$209 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $206
$206 — —
KEVZARA
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $187
$187 — —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $154
$154 — —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $138
$138 34 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

419 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record