Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Joshua Oaks

Internal Medicine Bountiful, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1205221405 CMS profile 4223037

520 Medical Dr, Ste 300, Bountiful, UT 84010

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,439

1,082 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$100

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$956,095 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2025

Through program year 2025, Joshua Oaks of Bountiful, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,439 across 1,082 general payments and $100 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $956,095 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,301 147
2024 General $2,844 151
2023 General $2,358 148
2023 Research $50 1
2022 General $2,381 154
2022 Research $50 1
2021 General $2,512 180
2020 General $2,141 143
2019 General $1,902 159

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Joshua Oaks
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Joshua Oaks were reported at $2,301. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Joshua Oaks Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,902 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,141 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,512 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,381 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,358 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,844 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,301 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $1,458 116 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,418 94 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,405 98 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,197 69 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $974 52 payments
  6. Astellas Pharma US Inc $947 44 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $906 68 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $862 47 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $672 49 payments
  10. Amarin Pharma Inc. $646 57 payments
  11. Other $5,954 388 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,865 1,077 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $300 1 payment
  3. Education $274 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Repatha $809 57 payments
  2. Otezla $644 50 payments
  3. Vascepa $599 54 payments
  4. JARDIANCE $576 33 payments
  5. TRADJENTA $567 32 payments
  6. ELIQUIS $565 47 payments
  7. VRAYLAR $559 47 payments
  8. FARXIGA $492 23 payments
  9. SPRAVATO $484 20 payments
  10. MOUNJARO $462 34 payments
  11. Other $16,936 1,182 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk AS $100 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 172 drugs

Part D claims

14,693

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,489,911

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

15.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 243 $338,629
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 141 $200,786
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 81 $134,687
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 86 $96,172
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 58 $85,663
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 33 $57,268
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 47 $55,557
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 61 $47,491
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 20 $40,071
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 22 $35,899

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 172 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 79 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$187,606

Of which drugs: $30,348

Medicare patients

362

Average age 79

Services billed

3,447

197 women, 165 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 49%
Chronic kidney disease 46%
Diabetes 29%
Heart failure 29%
Depression 28%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 97 97 $14,643
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 172 172 $13,909
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 43 300 $210

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 42 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Veozah
$209 — —
REXULTI
$171 — —
VRAYLAR
$164 — —
MOUNJARO
$161 33 —
Korlym
$117 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 42 with Patron

Records

1,084 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record