Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Joshua Mandrell

Dermatology Ruston, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1770781650 CMS profile 1097199

1200 S Farmerville St, Ruston, LA 71270

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,037

377 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,500 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2019

Through program year 2025, Joshua Mandrell of Ruston, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,037 across 377 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,500 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 72nd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,172 58
2024 General $1,182 57
2023 General $1,604 85
2022 General $1,053 71
2021 General $784 44
2020 General $555 29
2019 General $687 33

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Joshua Mandrell
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Joshua Mandrell were reported at $1,172. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Joshua Mandrell Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $687 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $555 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $784 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $1,053 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $1,604 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $1,182 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $1,172 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,752 74 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,629 118 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $829 39 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $495 25 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $435 24 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $404 14 payments
  7. Incyte Corporation $286 18 payments
  8. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $256 11 payments
  9. LEO Pharma Inc. $242 17 payments
  10. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $106 6 payments
  11. Other $604 31 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,257 366 payments
  2. Education $780 11 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,602 65 payments
  2. DUPIXENT $1,172 55 payments
  3. RINVOQ $768 63 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $513 35 payments
  5. TALTZ $418 23 payments
  6. CIBINQO $388 13 payments
  7. SIMPONI ARIA $382 22 payments
  8. STELARA $382 22 payments
  9. SIMPONI $382 22 payments
  10. HUMIRA $369 22 payments
  11. Other $2,692 139 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

316

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$99,326

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

3.8%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 12 $89,637
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 39 $2,909
Fluorouracil Generic 40 $2,475
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 31 $945
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 62 $859
Ketoconazole Generic 44 $807
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 11 $693
Betamethasone Valerate Generic 14 $453
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 40 $441
Mupirocin Generic 12 $79

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 103 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$698,311

Of which drugs: $104,625

Medicare patients

1,688

Average age 76

Services billed

11,379

801 women, 887 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 48%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 29%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Depression 16%
COPD 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 50 86 $26,028
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 35 90 $59

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $235
$235 — —
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $219
$219 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $172
$172 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $95
$95 — —
OPZELURA
  • Incyte Corporation $59
$59 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

377 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record