Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Joseph Wanzek

Family Medicine Council Bluffs, IA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1164538674 CMS profile 7316

3434 W Broadway, Suite 100, Council Bluffs, IA 51501

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,813

764 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Joseph Wanzek of Council Bluffs, IA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,813 across 764 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,024 157
2024 General $2,880 157
2023 General $2,051 122
2022 General $1,847 121
2021 General $1,671 113
2020 General $641 42
2019 General $699 52

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Joseph Wanzek
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Joseph Wanzek were reported at $3,024. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Joseph Wanzek Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $699 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $641 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,671 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,847 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,051 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $2,880 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $3,024 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,844 115 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,357 66 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $1,109 75 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $930 61 payments
  5. Mylan Specialty L.P. $550 34 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $512 31 payments
  7. Lundbeck LLC $491 26 payments
  8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $461 30 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $455 29 payments
  10. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $394 24 payments
  11. Other $4,708 273 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,657 757 payments
  2. Education $155 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $860 34 payments
  2. QULIPTA $810 48 payments
  3. UBRELVY $732 42 payments
  4. MOUNJARO $569 38 payments
  5. YUPELRI $524 31 payments
  6. Ozempic $512 31 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT $501 34 payments
  8. REXULTI $491 26 payments
  9. VRAYLAR $422 30 payments
  10. RYBELSUS $410 25 payments
  11. Other $10,663 643 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 187 drugs

Part D claims

9,949

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$961,110

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

25.8%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 68 $82,032
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 42 $72,101
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 82 $66,512
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 65 $51,343
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 62 $47,740
Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl Brand 30 $47,524
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 103 $47,431
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 41 $45,437
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 34 $40,720
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 35 $30,314

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 187 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$46,576

Of which drugs: $2,107

Medicare patients

180

Average age 71

Services billed

1,062

94 women, 86 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 49%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
COPD 22%
Depression 19%
Heart failure 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 14 14 $823
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 15 67 $36

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 43 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
$232 30 —
REXULTI
$219 42 —
XIFAXAN
$205 — —
ZENPEP
$182 — —
FARXIGA
$177 62 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 43 with Patron

Records

764 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Iowa

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record