Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Joseph Lambert

Family Medicine North Richland Hills, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1114915493 CMS profile 141490

4351 Booth Calloway Rd, #101, North Richland Hills, TX 76180

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,460

719 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$606,430 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Joseph Lambert of North Richland Hills, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,460 across 719 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $606,430 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $759 46
2024 General $1,598 95
2023 General $1,113 68
2022 General $1,573 102
2021 General $1,735 108
2020 General $1,314 93
2019 General $2,368 207

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Joseph Lambert
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Joseph Lambert were reported at $759. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Joseph Lambert Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,368 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,314 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,735 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,573 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,113 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,598 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $759 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,039 70 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,036 46 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $777 50 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $721 58 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $662 57 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $635 60 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $477 25 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $371 29 payments
  9. Amarin Pharma Inc. $344 20 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $337 33 payments
  11. Other $4,062 271 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,323 716 payments
  2. Education $137 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $810 30 payments
  2. JARDIANCE $593 49 payments
  3. Ozempic $493 50 payments
  4. VRAYLAR $461 26 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $435 29 payments
  6. MOUNJARO $353 23 payments
  7. SYMBICORT $342 11 payments
  8. Repatha $334 26 payments
  9. STEGLATRO $318 29 payments
  10. UBRELVY $307 25 payments
  11. Other $9,362 639 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 123 drugs

Part D claims

7,596

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$580,170

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

20%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 79 $101,533
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 50 $83,178
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 69 $75,795
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 51 $61,642
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 21 $31,206
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 24 $27,110
Bydureon Bcise Exenatide Microspheres Brand 20 $18,767
Shingrix Varicella-Zoster Ge/As01b/Pf Brand 62 $13,603
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 16 $13,515
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 14 $13,350

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 123 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 70 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$193,087

Of which drugs: $886

Medicare patients

577

Average age 73

Services billed

17,364

299 women, 278 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 40%
Diabetes 32%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Depression 19%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Cancer 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 66 6,403 $613
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 21 21 $115

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$138 79 —
VRAYLAR
$105 — —
Dyanavel XR
$104 — —
Repatha
$93 — —
MOUNJARO
$75 69 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

719 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record