Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jorge Martinez

Internal Medicine Murrieta, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1992748883 CMS profile 90425

39755 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd Ste E120, Murrieta, CA 92563

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$24,389

1,317 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jorge Martinez of Murrieta, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $24,389 across 1,317 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,152 197
2024 General $4,143 200
2023 General $3,054 171
2022 General $2,554 131
2021 General $3,703 196
2020 General $2,810 170
2019 General $3,973 252

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jorge Martinez
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jorge Martinez were reported at $4,152. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Jorge Martinez Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,973 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,810 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,703 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,554 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,054 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $4,143 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $4,152 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,686 100 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,009 115 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,949 107 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,632 93 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,274 106 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $1,259 84 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,212 66 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,190 78 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $967 65 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $810 52 payments
  11. Other $9,401 451 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $24,144 1,302 payments
  2. Education $245 15 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VRAYLAR $1,306 67 payments
  2. XARELTO $1,146 75 payments
  3. BREZTRI $1,048 37 payments
  4. FARXIGA $1,014 34 payments
  5. EVENITY $931 48 payments
  6. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $868 53 payments
  7. Prolia $858 44 payments
  8. Repatha $807 49 payments
  9. Otezla $802 53 payments
  10. Korlym $695 27 payments
  11. Other $21,441 1,200 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 207 drugs

Part D claims

18,905

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$3,300,033

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

33.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 543 $519,277
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 303 $353,538
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 277 $315,912
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 275 $304,697
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 171 $202,087
Prolia Denosumab Brand 113 $184,277
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 62 $114,498
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 101 $108,595
Dapagliflozin Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 129 $94,834
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 100 $88,882

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 207 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$80,682

Of which drugs: $1,711

Medicare patients

217

Average age 74

Services billed

1,581

115 women, 102 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 45%
Diabetes 42%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Depression 25%
Heart failure 24%
Osteoporosis 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent, 0.5 ml dosage 90658 Office 16 16 $343

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 45 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
$446 — —
LEQVIO
$234 — —
INGREZZA
$220 — —
JARDIANCE
$207 275 —
AIRSUPRA
$199 12 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 45 with Patron

Records

1,317 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record