Who Paid My Doc
Jordan Mast
Physician Assistant, Medical Denver, CO Physician Assistant
NPI 1518211051 CMS profile 10721551
950 East Harvard Ave Ste 570, Denver, CO 80210
General payments
$246,844
Research payments
$1,110
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Jordan Mast of Denver, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $246,844 across 2,516 general payments and $1,110 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Physician Assistant, Medical profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
7 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $88,190 | 510 | |
| 2025 | Research | $780 | 1 | |
| 2024 | General | $60,449 | 569 | |
| 2024 | Research | $330 | 1 | |
| 2023 | General | $24,643 | 470 | |
| 2022 | General | $31,783 | 512 | |
| 2021 | General | $41,779 | 455 |
Beside peers
- Jordan Mast
- Physician Assistant, Medical median
- Middle half of Physician Assistant, Medical
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Jordan Mast were reported at $88,190. Among 16,675 Physician Assistant, Medical profiles paid that year, the median was $214 and the middle half received between $62 and $755.
Show as a table
| Year | Jordan Mast | Physician Assistant, Medical median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $0 | $61 | $19–$193 | $163 |
| 2020 | $0 | $20 | $14–$64 | $114 |
| 2021 | $41,779 | $156 | $41–$563 | $132 |
| 2022 | $31,783 | $185 | $55–$649 | $149 |
| 2023 | $24,643 | $199 | $58–$717 | $160 |
| 2024 | $60,449 | $206 | $62–$740 | $164 |
| 2025 | $88,190 | $214 | $62–$755 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 51 drugsPart D claims
1,805
Drug cost
$964,690
Branded share of claims
39.4%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panzyga Immun Glob G(Igg)-Ifas/Glycine | Brand | 14 | $459,603 | |
| Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm | Brand | 126 | $97,360 | |
| Qulipta Atogepant | Brand | 66 | $75,677 | |
| Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate | Brand | 49 | $64,838 | |
| Ubrelvy Ubrogepant | Brand | 41 | $60,144 | |
| Emgality Syringe Galcanezumab-Gnlm | Brand | 11 | $55,190 | |
| Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe | Brand | 44 | $37,215 | |
| Ajovy Autoinjector Fremanezumab-Vfrm | Brand | 27 | $22,080 | |
| Botox Onabotulinumtoxina | Brand | 16 | $21,317 | |
| Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate | Brand | 14 | $17,128 |
The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 51 counted.
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Payments and prescribing
First 5 of 64 products · payments 2024Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.
| Product | Paid by | Related payments | Part D claims | Part B services |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOTOX |
|
$13,888 | 16 | — |
| Leqembi |
|
$12,845 | — | — |
| QULIPTA |
|
$8,802 | 66 | — |
| UBRELVY |
|
$8,434 | 41 | — |
| ZAVZPRET |
|
$3,977 | — | — |
A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.
See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 64 with PatronRecords
2,518 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Physician Assistant, Medical in Colorado
Christen Kutz
Physician Assistant, Medical · Colorado Springs, CO
Amanda Mixon
Physician Assistant, Medical · Fort Collins, CO
Kristin Rygg
Physician Assistant, Medical · Colorado Springs, CO
John Novak
Physician Assistant, Medical · Aurora, CO
Michelle Barnett
Physician Assistant, Medical · Colorado Springs, CO
Michael Jacobson
Physician Assistant, Medical · Fort Collins, CO
Related records
Physician Assistant, Medical in Colorado
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Physician Assistant, Medical
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Colorado
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.