Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jonathan Schulhof

Glaucoma Specialist Brooklyn, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1972893915 CMS profile 3324506

1987 Utica Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11234

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$73,034

239 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jonathan Schulhof of Brooklyn, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $73,034 across 239 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Glaucoma Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $7,711 63
2024 General $10,457 25
2023 General $16,732 46
2022 General $1,822 18
2021 General $16,401 37
2020 General $6,046 14
2019 General $13,866 36

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jonathan Schulhof
  • Glaucoma Specialist median
  • Middle half of Glaucoma Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jonathan Schulhof were reported at $7,711. Among 370 Glaucoma Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $597 and the middle half received between $244 and $1,607.

Show as a table
Year Jonathan Schulhof Glaucoma Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $13,866 $433 $150–$1,170 $163
2020 $6,046 $242 $74–$693 $114
2021 $16,401 $324 $122–$936 $132
2022 $1,822 $399 $121–$1,081 $149
2023 $16,732 $458 $190–$1,208 $160
2024 $10,457 $558 $215–$1,359 $164
2025 $7,711 $597 $244–$1,607 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $26,399 31 payments
  2. Glaukos Corporation $17,484 17 payments
  3. Alcon Vision LLC $14,874 36 payments
  4. New World Medical,Inc. $6,023 23 payments
  5. Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. $2,529 7 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $1,679 31 payments
  7. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,575 1 payment
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $926 47 payments
  9. Ivantis, Inc $557 2 payments
  10. TissueTech, Inc. $410 8 payments
  11. Other $578 36 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $36,577 17 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $22,420 14 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $8,571 199 payments
  4. Honoraria $4,500 2 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $921 6 payments
  6. Gift $45 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. rhopressa Glaucoma $15,848 18 payments
  2. rocklatan Glaucoma $15,848 18 payments
  3. Rhopressa Ophthalmology $13,831 11 payments
  4. Rocklatan Ophthalmology $12,766 22 payments
  5. Simbrinza $11,412 12 payments
  6. Rhopressa Glaucoma $10,672 14 payments
  7. Rocklatan Glaucoma $10,649 13 payments
  8. Travoprost Intraocular Implant - iDose $5,818 5 payments
  9. iStent inject Trabecular Micro-Bypass System Model G2-M-IS $4,750 2 payments
  10. Ahmed Glaucoma Valve $4,746 18 payments
  11. Other $27,862 214 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

6,670

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$1,288,943

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

39.8%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 761 $470,448
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 229 $170,472
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 215 $105,863
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 125 $84,314
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 99 $59,263
Difluprednate Generic 372 $54,809
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 125 $45,624
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 100 $44,498
Prolensa Bromfenac Sodium Brand 85 $41,430
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 701 $38,195

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 39 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$342,907

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

591

Average age 75

Services billed

4,602

351 women, 240 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 55%
Arthritis 41%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Cancer 19%
Heart failure 17%
Depression 11%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Rocklatan
$1,309 229 —
Simbrinza
$1,125 125 —
Rhopressa
$1,125 125 —
LUMIGAN
$94 761 —
VYZULTA
$30 99 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

239 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Glaucoma Specialist in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record