Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jonathan Hubbard

Family Medicine St George, UT Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1609894922 CMS profile 345585

2825 E Mall Dr, St George, UT 84790

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,092

132 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$680,542 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Jonathan Hubbard of St George, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,092 across 132 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $680,542 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $371 25
2024 General $276 16
2023 General $297 16
2022 General $540 34
2021 General $259 16
2020 General $179 11
2019 General $170 14

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jonathan Hubbard
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jonathan Hubbard were reported at $371. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Jonathan Hubbard Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $170 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $179 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $259 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $540 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $297 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $276 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $371 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $781 47 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $288 20 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $138 10 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $133 9 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $106 7 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $100 6 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $48 3 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $47 3 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $46 3 payments
  10. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $38 2 payments
  11. Other $368 22 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,092 132 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VRAYLAR $372 22 payments
  2. UBRELVY $319 18 payments
  3. QULIPTA $240 15 payments
  4. Repatha $206 16 payments
  5. Otezla $157 12 payments
  6. AIMOVIG $138 11 payments
  7. Ozempic $109 8 payments
  8. RYBELSUS $90 6 payments
  9. LEQVIO $83 5 payments
  10. PREVNAR 20 $74 5 payments
  11. Other $1,484 95 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 78 drugs

Part D claims

3,846

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$167,666

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

17.3%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 53 $35,632
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 32 $32,090
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 19 $30,247
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 11 $12,953
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 14 $4,688
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 269 $3,353
Omeprazole Generic 165 $2,590
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 158 $1,954
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 109 $1,669
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 39 $1,618

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 78 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 94 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$101,803

Of which drugs: $5,122

Medicare patients

292

Average age 74

Services billed

3,177

150 women, 142 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 52%
Diabetes 24%
Depression 23%
Osteoporosis 19%
Cancer 16%
Ischemic heart disease 15%
Atrial fibrillation 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 33 33 $2,680

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $78
$78 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $36
$36 — —
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $31
$31 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $27
$27 — —
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $17
$17 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

132 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record