Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jon Fukumoto

Hematology Honolulu, HI Medical Doctor

NPI 1477663284 CMS profile 111931

1329 Lusitana St Ste 307, Honolulu, HI 96813

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$30,032

815 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$310,995 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Jon Fukumoto of Honolulu, HI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $30,032 across 815 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $310,995 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 73rd percentile of Hematology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,320 173
2024 General $4,900 159
2023 General $3,537 126
2022 General $7,126 107
2021 General $2,918 118
2020 General $4,493 75
2019 General $1,737 57

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jon Fukumoto
  • Hematology median
  • Middle half of Hematology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jon Fukumoto were reported at $5,320. Among 733 Hematology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,155 and the middle half received between $135 and $8,023.

Show as a table
Year Jon Fukumoto Hematology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,737 $1,012 $122–$9,834 $163
2020 $4,493 $1,475 $115–$9,198 $114
2021 $2,918 $1,470 $125–$7,444 $132
2022 $7,126 $1,371 $139–$8,471 $149
2023 $3,537 $1,295 $147–$11,010 $160
2024 $4,900 $1,286 $146–$9,230 $164
2025 $5,320 $1,155 $135–$8,023 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genzyme Corporation $6,778 38 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,607 39 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,411 56 payments
  4. Incyte Corporation $1,250 39 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $1,229 41 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $1,020 41 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $734 25 payments
  8. Epizyme, Inc., $727 8 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $713 9 payments
  10. PharmaEssentia USA Corporation $674 18 payments
  11. Other $13,889 501 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $22,889 795 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $6,141 6 payments
  3. Honoraria $600 1 payment
  4. Education $402 13 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SARCLISA $3,286 14 payments
  2. DARZALEX $1,148 28 payments
  3. JAKAFI $698 23 payments
  4. BESREMI $674 18 payments
  5. BLENREP $584 3 payments
  6. BRUKINSA $553 19 payments
  7. IMBRUVICA $547 37 payments
  8. TECVAYLI $540 8 payments
  9. CARVYKTI $524 6 payments
  10. EPKINLY $479 19 payments
  11. Other $24,024 884 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 35 drugs

Part D claims

985

Median for Hematology: 273

Drug cost

$6,331,499

Median for Hematology: $800,183

Branded share of claims

53.3%

Median for Hematology: 39.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 72 $1,190,770
Lenalidomide Generic 52 $979,365
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 20 $609,528
Bosulif Bosutinib Brand 50 $580,965
Darzalex Faspro Daratumumab-Hyaluronidase-Fihj Brand 29 $390,054
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 22 $304,949
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 18 $304,696
Promacta Eltrombopag Olamine Brand 24 $287,427
Kyprolis Carfilzomib Brand 39 $273,415
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 11 $263,291

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 35 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 799 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 117 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$948,065

Of which drugs: $760,419

Medicare patients

336

Average age 77

Services billed

42,470

148 women, 188 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 57%
Diabetes 38%
Arthritis 34%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Cancer 27%
Heart failure 23%
Osteoporosis 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, epoetin alfa, (for non-esrd use), 1000 units J0885 Office 18 3,669 $22,452
Infusion, normal saline solution , 1000 cc J7030 Office 11 21 $43
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 11 130 $12

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 92 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ALTUVIIIO
$240 — —
EPKINLY
$222 — —
ELREXFIO
$200 — —
DARZALEX
$198 29 —
TECVAYLI
$175 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 92 with Patron

Records

815 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record