Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Tuttle

Internal Medicine Noblesville, IN Medical Doctor

NPI 1194712877 CMS profile 235684

865 Westfield Rd Ste A, Noblesville, IN 46062

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,768

696 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, John Tuttle of Noblesville, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,768 across 696 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $234 6
2024 General $2,041 113
2023 General $2,226 124
2022 General $1,571 95
2021 General $3,272 113
2020 General $1,567 70
2019 General $4,858 175

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Tuttle
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Tuttle were reported at $234. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year John Tuttle Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $4,858 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,567 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,272 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,571 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,226 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,041 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $234 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $4,307 121 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,312 74 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,265 40 payments
  4. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,227 3 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $1,126 67 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $818 69 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $707 42 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $702 53 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $608 47 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $408 8 payments
  11. Other $3,290 172 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,482 685 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $4,712 3 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $300 1 payment
  4. Education $275 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT $1,269 6 payments
  2. FARXIGA $926 19 payments
  3. Prolia $753 46 payments
  4. EVENITY $725 44 payments
  5. Ozempic $670 58 payments
  6. XARELTO $631 31 payments
  7. UBRELVY $559 34 payments
  8. RYBELSUS $507 40 payments
  9. VRAYLAR $505 24 payments
  10. MOUNJARO $465 31 payments
  11. Other $9,602 595 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 181 drugs

Part D claims

11,972

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,441,286

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

25.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 185 $171,605
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 137 $170,025
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 132 $152,754
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 130 $128,605
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 102 $80,791
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 61 $72,699
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 67 $57,227
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 33 $50,178
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 52 $38,896
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 21 $26,650

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 181 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$152,279

Of which drugs: $84,999

Medicare patients

314

Average age 76

Services billed

20,348

176 women, 138 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 45%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Diabetes 27%
Osteoporosis 25%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Depression 19%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 34 3,360 $62,653
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 38 38 $3,109
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 14 144 $108

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 40 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
$172 — —
QULIPTA
$116 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$114 102 —
ZENPEP
$113 — —
MOUNJARO
$113 132 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 40 with Patron

Records

696 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record