Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Matthew Pierce

Hematology & Oncology Birmingham, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1669799961 CMS profile 1295819

100 Pilot Medical Dr Ste 175, Birmingham, AL 35235

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,609

852 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, John Matthew Pierce of Birmingham, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,609 across 852 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 77th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,871 142
2024 General $2,974 144
2023 General $2,465 130
2022 General $2,890 163
2021 General $1,303 80
2020 General $1,119 58
2019 General $1,986 135

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Matthew Pierce
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Matthew Pierce were reported at $2,871. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year John Matthew Pierce Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,986 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $1,119 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $1,303 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $2,890 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $2,465 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $2,974 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $2,871 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,350 76 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,168 85 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $995 51 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $909 57 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $816 46 payments
  6. Celgene Corporation $746 42 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $663 37 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $562 34 payments
  9. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $513 27 payments
  10. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $510 21 payments
  11. Other $7,378 376 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,508 844 payments
  2. Education $101 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $961 49 payments
  2. OPDIVO $878 63 payments
  3. Lenvima $437 25 payments
  4. VERZENIO $406 26 payments
  5. KISQALI $382 21 payments
  6. REBLOZYL $360 20 payments
  7. ADCETRIS $355 23 payments
  8. IMFINZI $333 15 payments
  9. XTANDI $302 16 payments
  10. LIBTAYO $289 16 payments
  11. Other $14,537 782 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 46 drugs

Part D claims

1,942

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$4,119,944

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

24.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 45 $778,985
Lenalidomide Generic 52 $715,569
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 45 $679,433
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 18 $419,308
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 28 $358,818
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 22 $271,479
Lynparza Olaparib Brand 13 $221,781
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 13 $203,866
Erleada Apalutamide Brand 12 $181,804
Promacta Eltrombopag Olamine Brand 12 $87,010

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 46 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 108 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,834,452

Of which drugs: $1,716,024

Medicare patients

314

Average age 75

Services billed

105,520

201 women, 113 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Cancer 49%
Diabetes 41%
Chronic kidney disease 39%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
COPD 31%
Atrial fibrillation 28%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 20 4,800 $97,885
Injection, pegfilgrastim-fpgk (stimufend), biosimilar, 0.5 mg Q5127 Office 12 312 $79,492
Injection, ferric derisomaltose, 10 mg J1437 Office 20 2,100 $34,374
Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg J1439 Office 13 13,500 $11,871
Injection, ferumoxytol, for treatment of iron deficiency anemia, 1 mg (non-esrd use) Q0138 Office 13 9,690 $2,430
Injection, palonosetron hcl, 25 mcg J2469 Office 17 500 $343
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 25 904 $77

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 73 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KEYTRUDA
$148 — —
KISQALI
$116 — —
REBLOZYL
$108 — —
SCEMBLIX
$95 — —
XTANDI
$95 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 73 with Patron

Records

852 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record