Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Lilly

Internal Medicine Dunbar, WV Medical Doctor

NPI 1144281585 CMS profile 766059

1100 Grosscup Ave, Dunbar, WV 25064

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,496

599 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, John Lilly of Dunbar, WV is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,496 across 599 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,481 82
2024 General $1,853 101
2023 General $2,010 126
2022 General $1,520 110
2021 General $464 20
2020 General $231 17
2019 General $1,939 143

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Lilly
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Lilly were reported at $1,481. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year John Lilly Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,939 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $231 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $464 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,520 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,010 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,853 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,481 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,095 181 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,120 54 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,061 59 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $673 43 payments
  5. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $582 28 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $560 41 payments
  7. Dexcom, Inc. $384 15 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $351 20 payments
  9. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $326 20 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $269 20 payments
  11. Other $2,075 118 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,488 598 payments
  2. Education $8 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,725 144 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,559 123 payments
  3. FARXIGA $633 31 payments
  4. UBRELVY $633 36 payments
  5. Kerendia $560 41 payments
  6. QULIPTA $485 33 payments
  7. JARDIANCE $396 21 payments
  8. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $384 15 payments
  9. BREZTRI $366 13 payments
  10. XIFAXAN $326 20 payments
  11. Other $5,795 353 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 169 drugs

Part D claims

14,272

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,037,786

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 121 $174,361
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 117 $134,567
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 79 $95,881
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 84 $81,356
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 48 $47,873
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 23 $46,393
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 39 $40,902
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 23 $36,133
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 38 $32,224
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 36 $26,853

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 169 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 19 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$85,864

Of which drugs: $392

Medicare patients

345

Average age 75

Services billed

1,581

183 women, 162 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 61%
Arthritis 59%
Depression 46%
Diabetes 42%
Ischemic heart disease 42%
COPD 30%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 21 100 $392

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $227
$227 13 —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $191
$191 117 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $139
$139 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $135
$135 121 —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $113
$113 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

599 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in West Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record