Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ali Khan

Internal Medicine Buckhannon, WV Medical Doctor

NPI 1528089158 CMS profile 23386

2 Hartman Plz, Buckhannon, WV 26201

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,410

1,085 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ali Khan of Buckhannon, WV is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,410 across 1,085 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,257 109
2024 General $7,432 146
2023 General $2,423 134
2022 General $2,177 120
2021 General $2,569 187
2020 General $2,092 144
2019 General $2,461 245

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ali Khan
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ali Khan were reported at $2,257. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Ali Khan Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,461 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,092 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,569 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,177 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,423 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $7,432 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,257 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $6,142 90 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,475 119 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,993 132 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $768 52 payments
  5. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $728 54 payments
  6. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $689 42 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $670 38 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $627 61 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $555 40 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $541 51 payments
  11. Other $6,221 406 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,858 1,076 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $3,325 1 payment
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,080 2 payments
  4. Education $147 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KRYSTEXXA Inflammation/Rare Disease $5,601 58 payments
  2. BREZTRI $1,307 50 payments
  3. UBRELVY $1,054 39 payments
  4. FARXIGA $911 38 payments
  5. NEXLETOL $728 54 payments
  6. KRYSTEXXA Krystexxa $670 38 payments
  7. AIRSUPRA $550 23 payments
  8. XARELTO $515 24 payments
  9. LINZESS $473 59 payments
  10. Kerendia $462 25 payments
  11. Other $13,419 1,039 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 126 drugs

Part D claims

6,655

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,825,781

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

21.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Krystexxa Pegloticase Brand 13 $739,708
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 198 $350,895
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 81 $110,405
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 51 $70,922
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 50 $70,126
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 56 $64,174
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 39 $64,137
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 60 $63,271
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 55 $42,645
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 32 $38,634

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 126 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 68 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$83,267

Of which drugs: $1,833

Medicare patients

147

Average age 74

Services billed

4,019

72 women, 75 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Diabetes 29%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
COPD 19%
Depression 19%
Heart failure 16%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 21 1,560 $162
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 32 114 $104
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 32 66 $36

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KRYSTEXXA
$5,026 13 —
UBRELVY
$263 — —
PURIFIED CORTROPHIN GEL
$252 — —
AIRSUPRA
$218 — —
Kerendia
$164 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

1,085 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in West Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record