Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Knight

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Jackson, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1386008928 CMS profile 11254567

971 Lakeland Dr Ste 450, Jackson, MS 39216

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,970

482 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, John Knight of Jackson, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,970 across 482 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 77th percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,159 111
2024 General $2,010 117
2023 General $2,056 113
2022 General $2,426 127
2021 General $320 14

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Knight
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Knight were reported at $2,159. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year John Knight Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $0 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $320 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $2,426 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $2,056 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $2,010 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $2,159 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,210 56 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $1,054 66 payments
  3. Corcept Therapeutics $739 25 payments
  4. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $694 39 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $670 41 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $646 39 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $432 28 payments
  8. Dexcom, Inc. $398 18 payments
  9. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $233 13 payments
  10. Insulet Corporation $211 7 payments
  11. Other $2,684 150 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,970 482 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Ozempic $880 39 payments
  2. Korlym $739 25 payments
  3. Kerendia $694 39 payments
  4. MOUNJARO $672 38 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $655 37 payments
  6. LEQVIO $650 39 payments
  7. FreeStyle Libre 3 $442 26 payments
  8. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $304 13 payments
  9. Wegovy $270 12 payments
  10. JARDIANCE $260 19 payments
  11. Other $5,818 338 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 80 drugs

Part D claims

3,837

Median for Endocrinology: 1,959

Drug cost

$1,152,741

Median for Endocrinology: $890,201

Branded share of claims

43.8%

Median for Endocrinology: 57%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 202 $250,035
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 82 $140,671
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 139 $125,748
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 75 $56,548
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 50 $53,793
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 69 $48,932
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 50 $47,418
Fiasp Flextouch Insulin Aspart (Niacinamide) Brand 40 $46,222
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 26 $37,787
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 20 $37,234

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 80 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 6,527 Part D prescribers listed as Endocrinology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 51 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$123,673

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

336

Average age 73

Services billed

5,522

219 women, 117 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 57%
Arthritis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Depression 23%
Heart failure 16%
Cancer 16%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $308
$308 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $201
$201 82 —
Korlym
  • Corcept Therapeutics $115
$115 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $86
$86 139 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $86
$86 26 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

482 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record