Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Eric Dyess

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Jackson, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1699783928 CMS profile 121864

971 Lakeland Dr, Suite 450, Jackson, MS 39216

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$884,752

1,688 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Eric Dyess of Jackson, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $884,752 across 1,688 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $110,808 216
2024 General $52,984 191
2023 General $85,814 205
2022 General $150,329 260
2021 General $108,090 219
2020 General $87,781 167
2019 General $288,946 430

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Eric Dyess
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Eric Dyess were reported at $110,808. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year Eric Dyess Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $288,946 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $87,781 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $108,090 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $150,329 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $85,814 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $52,984 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $110,808 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $367,141 468 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $271,267 328 payments
  3. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $81,445 140 payments
  4. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $56,529 61 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $49,051 83 payments
  6. Corcept Therapeutics $24,257 51 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $14,757 68 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $12,039 26 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $1,398 86 payments
  10. Abbott Laboratories $1,038 62 payments
  11. Other $5,830 315 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $803,047 399 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $40,325 235 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $31,488 1,039 payments
  4. Honoraria $9,105 2 payments
  5. Consulting Fee $499 4 payments
  6. Education $289 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $271,185 323 payments
  2. Ozempic $185,932 241 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $130,762 197 payments
  4. Kerendia $81,445 140 payments
  5. INVOKANA $56,567 59 payments
  6. STEGLATRO $45,413 80 payments
  7. Tresiba $27,824 32 payments
  8. Korlym $24,257 51 payments
  9. Repatha $14,229 40 payments
  10. Xultophy 100/3.6 $12,124 13 payments
  11. Other $27,682 769 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 65 drugs

Part D claims

4,349

Median for Endocrinology: 1,959

Drug cost

$1,631,268

Median for Endocrinology: $890,201

Branded share of claims

55.6%

Median for Endocrinology: 57%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 326 $395,622
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 161 $223,318
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 148 $173,983
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 179 $150,412
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 214 $149,269
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 116 $78,289
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 73 $54,332
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 62 $51,323
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 52 $45,724
Fiasp Flextouch Insulin Aspart (Niacinamide) Brand 60 $35,155

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 65 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 6,527 Part D prescribers listed as Endocrinology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 52 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$139,420

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

328

Average age 71

Services billed

7,914

201 women, 127 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 63%
Arthritis 42%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Heart failure 10%
Depression 10%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RYBELSUS
$17,725 52 —
FARXIGA
$11,684 214 —
Ozempic
$11,044 326 —
Kerendia
$5,942 62 —
LEQVIO
$333 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

1,688 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record