Medical Doctor Program year 2024 Reported 2019–2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Joel Eisner

Allergy & Immunology Phoenixville, PA Medical Doctor

NPI 1053416008 CMS profile 183772

826 Main Street, Suite 100, Phoenixville, PA 19460

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,030

538 records reported · program years 2019–2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, Joel Eisner of Phoenixville, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,030 across 538 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Allergy & Immunology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $112 1
2022 General $139 8
2021 General $2,313 140
2020 General $1,808 111
2019 General $3,658 278

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Joel Eisner
  • Allergy & Immunology median
  • Middle half of Allergy & Immunology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Joel Eisner were reported at $0. Among 336 Allergy & Immunology profiles paid that year, the median was $682 and the middle half received between $143 and $2,317.

Show as a table
Year Joel Eisner Allergy & Immunology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,658 $378 $115–$1,178 $163
2020 $1,808 $303 $75–$1,581 $114
2021 $2,313 $407 $122–$1,475 $132
2022 $139 $357 $120–$1,340 $149
2023 $0 $445 $124–$1,536 $160
2024 $112 $541 $129–$1,763 $164
2025 $0 $682 $143–$2,317 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,048 61 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $726 57 payments
  3. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $722 50 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $626 42 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $590 60 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $485 29 payments
  7. Amarin Pharma Inc. $326 22 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $306 18 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $305 26 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $271 18 payments
  11. Other $2,625 155 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Food and Beverage $7,959 527 payments
  2. Education $71 11 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. XARELTO $712 49 payments
  2. Repatha $608 39 payments
  3. Prolia $475 25 payments
  4. ELIQUIS $395 42 payments
  5. STEGLATRO $298 25 payments
  6. Vascepa $295 20 payments
  7. EVENITY $290 19 payments
  8. JANUVIA $263 23 payments
  9. MYRBETRIQ $261 14 payments
  10. NUCALA $224 20 payments
  11. Other $7,152 495 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 182 drugs

Part D claims

16,241

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,258,989

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

19.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 266 $236,484
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 126 $152,458
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 101 $101,124
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 13 $94,050
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 71 $83,264
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 78 $80,487
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 23 $59,692
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 43 $38,093
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 59 $37,941
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 44 $29,633

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 182 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$50,795

Of which drugs: $7,088

Medicare patients

428

Average age 76

Services billed

1,201

209 women, 219 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 47%
Diabetes 29%
Osteoporosis 29%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Depression 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 53 53 $4,336
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 14 20 $15
Injection, lidocaine hcl for intravenous infusion, 10 mg J2001 Office 12 16 $0

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $112
$112 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

538 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Allergy & Immunology in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record