Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Joanna Geslani

Rheumatology Dallas, TX Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1124333703 CMS profile 142336

8144 Walnut Hill Ln, Suite 800, Dallas, TX 75231

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$242,082

1,977 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Joanna Geslani of Dallas, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $242,082 across 1,977 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $55,691 286
2024 General $32,591 289
2023 General $46,587 299
2022 General $53,363 269
2021 General $23,279 263
2020 General $13,161 193
2019 General $17,410 378

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Joanna Geslani
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Joanna Geslani were reported at $55,691. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Joanna Geslani Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $17,410 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $13,161 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $23,279 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $53,363 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $46,587 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $32,591 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $55,691 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $127,629 201 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $62,507 151 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $9,688 175 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $8,945 103 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $7,081 278 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $5,681 120 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $4,694 258 payments
  8. Progentec Diagnostics, Inc. $2,433 2 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $1,815 100 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $1,633 104 payments
  11. Other $9,977 485 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $161,460 78 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $40,520 1,809 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $20,070 65 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $19,681 8 payments
  5. Education $351 17 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BENLYSTA $127,610 200 payments
  2. SAPHNELO $61,798 117 payments
  3. Cimzia $8,241 133 payments
  4. COSENTYX $7,820 66 payments
  5. TREMFYA $5,320 78 payments
  6. RINVOQ $3,706 149 payments
  7. SIMPONI ARIA $2,342 72 payments
  8. HUMIRA $1,955 74 payments
  9. TALTZ $1,656 95 payments
  10. XELJANZ $1,515 99 payments
  11. Other $23,137 1,201 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 40 drugs

Part D claims

1,842

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,361,267

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

34.6%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Octagam Immun Globg(Igg)/Malt/Iga Ov50 Brand 21 $436,635
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 54 $387,741
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 40 $372,412
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 22 $183,673
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 28 $147,342
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 14 $145,944
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 20 $141,044
Orencia Abatacept Brand 20 $124,533
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 14 $120,136
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 13 $111,867

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 40 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 55 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$340,966

Of which drugs: $237,373

Medicare patients

219

Average age 72

Services billed

50,489

183 women, 36 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 41%
Diabetes 31%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Depression 25%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 24 2,520 $50,612
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 11 11 $900

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BENLYSTA
$19,146 28 —
SAPHNELO
$8,212 — —
RINVOQ
$631 — —
Cimzia
$592 — —
SKYRIZI
$285 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

1,977 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record