Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jinsong Zhang

General Practice Richardson, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1821280520 CMS profile 219179

3200 Talon Dr 100, Suite 100, Richardson, TX 75082

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,339

738 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jinsong Zhang of Richardson, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,339 across 738 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,481 93
2024 General $1,567 79
2023 General $1,467 76
2022 General $1,747 92
2021 General $2,673 146
2020 General $2,201 133
2019 General $3,203 119

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jinsong Zhang
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jinsong Zhang were reported at $5,481. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Jinsong Zhang General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $3,203 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $2,201 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $2,673 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $1,747 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $1,467 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $1,567 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $5,481 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Echosens North America, Inc. $3,600 2 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,982 167 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,191 70 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $1,019 66 payments
  5. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $904 39 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $860 28 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $754 48 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $661 30 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $650 35 payments
  10. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $551 23 payments
  11. Other $5,167 230 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,647 731 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $3,600 2 payments
  3. Education $93 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FibroScan $3,600 2 payments
  2. Saxenda $1,156 60 payments
  3. Ozempic $1,009 65 payments
  4. Kerendia $904 39 payments
  5. TRULICITY $533 40 payments
  6. XIFAXAN $517 21 payments
  7. Prolia $498 12 payments
  8. Wegovy $494 19 payments
  9. UBRELVY $446 31 payments
  10. RYBELSUS $439 36 payments
  11. Other $11,774 617 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 151 drugs

Part D claims

10,131

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,764,638

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

28%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 194 $238,280
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 164 $199,739
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 122 $163,633
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 105 $139,158
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 125 $124,422
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 77 $107,114
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 80 $89,009
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 55 $70,032
Prolia Denosumab Brand 39 $68,843
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 78 $55,441

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 151 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 72 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$185,410

Of which drugs: $17,659

Medicare patients

159

Average age 71

Services billed

3,724

88 women, 71 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 41%
Arthritis 38%
Osteoporosis 32%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Depression 18%
Ischemic heart disease 16%
COPD 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 30 30 $8,661
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 31 33 $4,823
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 48 49 $3,980
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 17 82 $61

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $235
$235 13 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $179
$179 29 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $134
$134 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $104
  • Lilly USA, LLC $8
$111 105 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $84
$84 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

738 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record