Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jillian Frieder

Dermatology Boca Raton, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1023490018 CMS profile 2784987

1601 Clint Moore Rd Ste 145, Boca Raton, FL 33487

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,320

195 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$8,500 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2024

Through program year 2025, Jillian Frieder of Boca Raton, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,320 across 195 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $8,500 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,456 28
2024 General $1,652 34
2023 General $3,959 31
2022 General $810 18
2021 General $2,476 24
2020 General $985 31
2019 General $984 29

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jillian Frieder
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jillian Frieder were reported at $1,456. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Jillian Frieder Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $984 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $985 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $2,476 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $810 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $3,959 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $1,652 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $1,456 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $3,966 24 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $1,807 5 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,533 47 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $964 25 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $837 13 payments
  6. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $494 10 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $472 11 payments
  8. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $385 7 payments
  9. Incyte Corporation $323 6 payments
  10. Allergan Inc. $249 7 payments
  11. Other $1,290 40 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,666 188 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $4,423 2 payments
  3. Education $210 4 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $22 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ILUMYA $3,475 11 payments
  2. Otezla $946 24 payments
  3. HUMIRA $943 32 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $763 31 payments
  5. DUPIXENT Immunology $569 14 payments
  6. LITFULO $479 8 payments
  7. CIBINQO $470 10 payments
  8. OPZELURA $323 6 payments
  9. NEMLUVIO $304 3 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $268 5 payments
  11. Other $2,618 95 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

914

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$20,394

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

2.5%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 177 $5,885
Fluorouracil Generic 81 $5,477
Ketoconazole Generic 99 $1,599
Doxycycline Monohydrate Generic 96 $1,257
Tretinoin Generic 14 $1,112
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 105 $1,050
Mupirocin Generic 115 $843
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 18 $609
Metronidazole Generic 15 $550
Minoxidil Generic 46 $515

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 77 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,071,170

Of which drugs: $32,037

Medicare patients

839

Average age 77

Services billed

11,499

475 women, 364 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 52%
Ischemic heart disease 43%
Osteoporosis 26%
Diabetes 24%
Cancer 21%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 25 31 $9,597

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 13 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $358
$358 — —
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $209
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $84
$293 — —
CIBINQO
  • PFIZER INC. $254
$254 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $200
$200 — —
LITFULO
  • PFIZER INC. $120
$120 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 13 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

195 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record