Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jennifer Odutola

Rheumatology Lansdowne, VA Medical Doctor

NPI 1750397725 CMS profile 170530

19500 Sandridge Way Ste 170, Lansdowne, VA 20176

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$20,809

1,014 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jennifer Odutola of Lansdowne, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $20,809 across 1,014 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,907 120
2024 General $3,763 165
2023 General $3,779 170
2022 General $3,023 156
2021 General $2,578 137
2020 General $1,537 80
2019 General $3,221 186

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jennifer Odutola
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jennifer Odutola were reported at $2,907. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Jennifer Odutola Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,221 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,537 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,578 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $3,023 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,779 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,763 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,907 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,692 116 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,362 111 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,255 105 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,819 83 payments
  5. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $1,390 44 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,385 58 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $1,371 79 payments
  8. Radius Health, Inc. $1,293 90 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $1,061 53 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $947 58 payments
  11. Other $4,235 217 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $20,418 1,006 payments
  2. Education $391 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,980 81 payments
  2. ACTHAR $1,390 44 payments
  3. BENLYSTA $1,385 58 payments
  4. SIMPONI ARIA $1,353 60 payments
  5. TREMFYA $1,245 49 payments
  6. TALTZ $1,033 51 payments
  7. Cimzia $993 57 payments
  8. XELJANZ $838 52 payments
  9. Tymlos $819 64 payments
  10. STELARA $789 40 payments
  11. Other $12,816 643 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 50 drugs

Part D claims

2,461

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,139,493

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

25.5%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 45 $455,070
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 19 $145,388
Otezla Apremilast Brand 27 $132,298
Simponi Golimumab Brand 11 $77,822
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 13 $72,754
Teriparatide Generic 27 $65,873
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 13 $52,329
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 31 $29,328
Rasuvo Methotrexate/Pf Brand 26 $29,165
Prolia Denosumab Brand 12 $20,895

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 50 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 37 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$532,447

Of which drugs: $444,823

Medicare patients

285

Average age 73

Services billed

57,398

240 women, 45 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 69%
Osteoporosis 48%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Depression 22%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Diabetes 18%
COPD 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 14 15,330 $131,157
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 13 11,100 $101,043
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 39 3,480 $71,064
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 21 106 $467
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 19 1,155 $251
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, up to 40 mg J2920 Office 12 21 $69
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 18 69 $43
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 14 32 $14

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ACTHAR
$433 — —
TALTZ
$293 — —
PURIFIED CORTROPHIN GEL
$242 — —
Cimzia
$234 13 —
Tymlos
$220 13 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

1,014 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record