Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jennifer Capezio

Rheumatology Lake Forest, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1528023058 CMS profile 114494

900 N Westmoreland Rd, Suite 222, Lake Forest, IL 60045

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,068

48 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jennifer Capezio of Lake Forest, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,068 across 48 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 63rd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $746 7
2024 General $684 6
2023 General $568 5
2022 General $206 3
2021 General $337 6
2020 General $2,757 5
2019 General $769 16

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jennifer Capezio
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jennifer Capezio were reported at $746. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Jennifer Capezio Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $769 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $2,757 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $337 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $206 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $568 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $684 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $746 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,048 14 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,039 9 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $571 8 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $374 3 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $343 3 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $252 3 payments
  7. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $165 2 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $119 3 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $105 1 payment
  10. Sobi, Inc $32 1 payment
  11. Other $21 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,397 42 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $2,600 1 payment
  3. Education $71 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ Immunology $2,757 5 payments
  2. EVENITY $357 3 payments
  3. Otezla $346 3 payments
  4. COSENTYX $296 5 payments
  5. RINVOQ Immunology $269 8 payments
  6. BENLYSTA $253 2 payments
  7. XELJANZ $252 3 payments
  8. TAVNEOS $249 2 payments
  9. Bimzelx $248 2 payments
  10. TREMFYA $245 3 payments
  11. Other $699 12 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 51 drugs

Part D claims

2,167

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,982,998

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

27.8%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 32 $505,712
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 51 $372,497
Otezla Apremilast Brand 55 $360,798
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 20 $196,617
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 19 $174,139
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 12 $85,564
Orencia Abatacept Brand 13 $72,214
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 12 $64,468
Teriparatide Generic 20 $45,463
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 12 $28,304

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 51 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 60 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,151,841

Of which drugs: $1,062,357

Medicare patients

713

Average age 75

Services billed

91,911

588 women, 125 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 66%
Osteoporosis 59%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Diabetes 21%
Depression 21%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 182 12,240 $248,259
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 13 5,550 $187,386
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 20 10,710 $91,567
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 18 3,080 $76,723
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 13 5,850 $47,241
Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg J1439 Office 16 13,500 $11,741
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 59 295 $1,335
Injection, iron sucrose, 1 mg J1756 Office 11 4,200 $751

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $242
$242 55 —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $124
$124 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $110
$110 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $86
$86 51 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

48 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record