Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jen Wang

Hematology & Oncology Brooklyn, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1205938115 CMS profile 100335

20-35 Ralph Ave, Ste B3, Brooklyn, NY 11234

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$25,288

727 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$79,652 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2023

Through program year 2025, Jen Wang of Brooklyn, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $25,288 across 727 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $79,652 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,665 38
2024 General $3,381 99
2023 General $3,299 120
2022 General $2,620 107
2021 General $3,120 126
2020 General $2,556 98
2019 General $8,646 139

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jen Wang
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jen Wang were reported at $1,665. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Jen Wang Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $8,646 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $2,556 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $3,120 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $2,620 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $3,299 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $3,381 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $1,665 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Celgene Corporation $4,656 22 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $3,203 85 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,481 60 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,744 84 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,524 60 payments
  6. Incyte Corporation $1,401 48 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,195 50 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $896 30 payments
  9. Astellas Pharma US Inc $628 21 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $546 22 payments
  11. Other $7,014 245 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $19,432 691 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $3,000 1 payment
  3. Education $1,871 31 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $985 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. CAR-T $3,164 4 payments
  2. ERLEADA $1,503 42 payments
  3. Fedratinib $1,244 6 payments
  4. KEYTRUDA $1,156 48 payments
  5. LYNPARZA $1,006 24 payments
  6. OPDIVO $933 41 payments
  7. DARZALEX $929 34 payments
  8. JAKAFI $741 35 payments
  9. IMBRUVICA $693 20 payments
  10. KISQALI $523 21 payments
  11. Other $15,457 589 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

741

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$6,187,245

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

73.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Keytruda Pembrolizumab Brand 94 $1,193,944
Reblozyl Luspatercept-Aamt Brand 61 $740,145
Alunbrig Brigatinib Brand 13 $515,709
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 16 $391,323
Opdivo Nivolumab Brand 29 $344,169
Sarclisa Isatuximab-Irfc Brand 24 $332,977
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 18 $271,638
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 11 $254,803
Kyprolis Carfilzomib Brand 17 $232,980
Truxima Rituximab-Abbs Brand 39 $208,770

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 36 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$204,792

Of which drugs: $158,619

Medicare patients

106

Average age 75

Services billed

29,102

63 women, 43 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 49%
Arthritis 47%
Chronic kidney disease 43%
Cancer 38%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
COPD 25%
Depression 25%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, iron sucrose, 1 mg J1756 Office 12 9,000 $1,437
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 34 792 $65

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KEYTRUDA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $272
$272 94 —
ERLEADA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $230
$230 14 —
SARCLISA
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $194
$194 24 —
OXBRYTA
  • PFIZER INC. $160
$160 — —
LYNPARZA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $133
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $14
$147 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

727 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record