Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jeffrey Ferber

Family Medicine Vista, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1609890813 CMS profile 73375

1926 Via Ctr, Vista, CA 92081

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,153

402 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jeffrey Ferber of Vista, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,153 across 402 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,824 62
2024 General $1,268 53
2023 General $1,247 61
2022 General $1,770 88
2021 General $1,041 47
2020 General $494 19
2019 General $1,509 72

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jeffrey Ferber
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jeffrey Ferber were reported at $1,824. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Jeffrey Ferber Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,509 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $494 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,041 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,770 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,247 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,268 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,824 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,040 48 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,018 43 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $686 25 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $630 25 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $619 33 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $456 25 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $443 18 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $390 17 payments
  9. Boston Scientific Corporation $358 7 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $268 15 payments
  11. Other $3,245 146 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,153 402 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $918 41 payments
  2. UBRELVY $548 20 payments
  3. ZEPBOUND $418 10 payments
  4. Kerendia $390 17 payments
  5. XARELTO $359 15 payments
  6. Ozempic $342 15 payments
  7. EVENITY $339 18 payments
  8. Prolia $317 17 payments
  9. Repatha $280 15 payments
  10. QULIPTA $261 10 payments
  11. Other $7,183 356 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 65 drugs

Part D claims

3,227

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$302,589

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

17.2%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 126 $147,905
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 33 $63,008
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 29 $27,432
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 14 $20,808
Losartan Potassium Generic 460 $5,332
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 236 $4,299
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 284 $2,988
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 134 $2,091
Sildenafil Citrate Generic 20 $1,939
Lantus Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 13 $1,931

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 65 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 45 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$42,442

Of which drugs: $9,281

Medicare patients

101

Average age 74

Services billed

872

49 women, 52 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 38%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Heart failure 19%
Diabetes 18%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Osteoporosis 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 20 22 $1,780

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $156
$156 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $90
$90 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $54
$54 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $54
$54 — —
DIFICID
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $54
$54 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

402 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record