Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jeffrey Cegelski

Pain Medicine Cary, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1144717026 CMS profile 4801942

115 Kildaire Park Dr Ste 205, Ste 205, Cary, NC 27518

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,185

115 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jeffrey Cegelski of Cary, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,185 across 115 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 73rd percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,440 62
2024 General $432 14
2023 General $1,621 21
2022 General $1,567 17
2019 General $126 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jeffrey Cegelski
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jeffrey Cegelski were reported at $3,440. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Jeffrey Cegelski Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $126 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $0 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $0 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $1,567 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $1,621 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $432 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $3,440 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $2,550 33 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $2,233 25 payments
  3. SI-BONE, Inc. $758 6 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $393 19 payments
  5. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $253 3 payments
  6. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $196 9 payments
  7. Curonix LLC $165 7 payments
  8. Stryker Corporation $156 1 payment
  9. Pacira Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $126 1 payment
  10. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $107 3 payments
  11. Other $248 8 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,524 103 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $2,648 11 payments
  3. Education $14 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $1,576 13 payments
  2. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $1,309 13 payments
  3. INCEPTIV $955 19 payments
  4. IFUSE IMPLANT SYSTEM $633 2 payments
  5. ETERNA Structural Heart $499 6 payments
  6. BOTOX $267 12 payments
  7. Evoke $253 3 payments
  8. PROCLAIM Structural Heart $221 2 payments
  9. ETERNA Neuromodulation $204 4 payments
  10. BELBUCA $196 9 payments
  11. Other $1,138 39 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

1,133

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$28,401

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

33.6%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Buprenorphine Generic 35 $10,580
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 183 $4,724
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 198 $4,577
Lidocaine Generic 26 $2,261
Pregabalin Generic 149 $1,847
Gabapentin Generic 128 $1,018
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 121 $900
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 38 $511
Cyclobenzaprine Hcl Generic 51 $479
Tramadol Hcl Generic 36 $409

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 45 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$135,666

Of which drugs: $517

Medicare patients

191

Average age 73

Services billed

5,331

111 women, 80 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 36%
Depression 35%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Osteoporosis 19%
Heart failure 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 35 2,290 $234
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 91 1,474 $129
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 11 14 $60
Low osmolar contrast material, 200-299 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9966 Office 56 102 $28
Injection, midazolam hydrochloride, per 1 mg J2250 Office 57 161 $17

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $114
$114 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $54
$54 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $38
$38 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

115 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record