Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jason Paek

Internal Medicine Walnut, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1770679631 CMS profile 216200

Golden Springs Medical Clinic, 20627 Golden Springs Dr 2D-E, Walnut, CA 91789

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,588

813 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jason Paek of Walnut, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,588 across 813 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,807 88
2024 General $1,630 79
2023 General $1,944 101
2022 General $3,239 173
2021 General $3,657 207
2020 General $1,512 87
2019 General $2,800 78

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jason Paek
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jason Paek were reported at $1,807. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Jason Paek Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,800 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,512 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,657 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,239 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,944 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,630 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,807 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,118 96 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,036 113 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,598 97 payments
  4. Amarin Pharma Inc. $1,421 53 payments
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,338 82 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,149 55 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,008 65 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $688 26 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $560 22 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $489 22 payments
  11. Other $4,182 182 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,452 806 payments
  2. Education $137 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,453 64 payments
  2. XARELTO $1,338 82 payments
  3. CREON $1,255 77 payments
  4. EVENITY $1,213 75 payments
  5. LINZESS $1,165 72 payments
  6. Prolia $1,022 78 payments
  7. Vascepa $1,012 49 payments
  8. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,002 49 payments
  9. Ozempic $842 61 payments
  10. RYBELSUS $798 59 payments
  11. Other $10,267 465 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 240 drugs

Part D claims

33,047

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$4,085,784

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

24%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 489 $608,741
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 646 $462,906
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 394 $309,218
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 573 $260,553
Prolia Denosumab Brand 143 $241,042
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 307 $189,729
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 211 $152,119
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 202 $134,397
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 121 $106,413
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 140 $105,631

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 240 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 32 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$136,190

Of which drugs: $957

Medicare patients

262

Average age 78

Services billed

2,281

159 women, 103 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 58%
Diabetes 39%
Arthritis 36%
Osteoporosis 28%
Alzheimer's or dementia 20%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
COPD 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent, 0.5 ml dosage 90658 Office 39 41 $878

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
EVENITY
$182 27 —
FARXIGA
$158 394 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$126 140 —
AIRSUPRA
$103 — —
VOQUEZNA
$95 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

813 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record