Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jason Green

Dermatology Fort Lauderdale, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1427167261 CMS profile 337157

5721 Ne 27Th Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$213,083

717 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$250,631 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Jason Green of Fort Lauderdale, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $213,083 across 717 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $250,631 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $103,916 195
2024 General $54,435 157
2023 General $12,682 115
2022 General $1,445 56
2021 General $8,005 68
2020 General $6,991 43
2019 General $25,610 83

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jason Green
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jason Green were reported at $103,916. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Jason Green Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $25,610 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $6,991 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $8,005 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $1,445 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $12,682 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $54,435 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $103,916 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ConvaTec Inc. $57,639 50 payments
  2. LEO Pharma Inc. $50,435 81 payments
  3. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $22,671 31 payments
  4. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $16,978 46 payments
  5. Celgene Corporation $14,643 29 payments
  6. Almirall LLC $11,149 19 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $10,318 68 payments
  8. Medimetriks Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $10,050 16 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $8,390 21 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $3,644 40 payments
  11. Other $7,167 316 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $83,834 42 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $77,911 38 payments
  3. Debt forgiveness $30,200 6 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $14,983 599 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $5,370 26 payments
  6. Education $435 5 payments
  7. Honoraria $350 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INNOVAMATRIX AC $57,675 52 payments
  2. ADBRY $44,260 67 payments
  3. NEMLUVIO $16,648 20 payments
  4. Otezla Dermatology $14,643 29 payments
  5. Seysara $10,277 15 payments
  6. ANZUPGO $9,817 13 payments
  7. Neo-Synalar $9,350 14 payments
  8. Otezla Inflammation $8,390 21 payments
  9. DUPIXENT $3,951 50 payments
  10. Tovet (emollient formulation) $2,800 8 payments
  11. Other $15,957 538 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

1,171

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$207,266

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

12.6%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 49 $182,369
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 123 $5,320
Ketoconazole Generic 239 $4,661
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 160 $2,216
Metronidazole Generic 30 $2,034
Tacrolimus Generic 12 $1,989
Fluorouracil Generic 26 $1,785
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 52 $1,679
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 140 $1,539
Betamethasone Diprop Augmented Betamethasone/Propylene Glyc Brand 35 $792

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 76 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$634,588

Of which drugs: $37,936

Medicare patients

388

Average age 76

Services billed

36,204

176 women, 212 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Diabetes 28%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Depression 23%
Osteoporosis 20%
Cancer 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 64 28,400 $37,880
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 13 72 $55

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ADBRY
$24,386 — —
DUPIXENT
$2,982 49 —
Neo-Synalar
$700 — —
Tovet (emollient formulation)
$350 — —
RINVOQ
$203 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

717 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record