Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2023–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jamie Hoang

Physician Assistant, Medical Tucson, AZ Physician Assistant

NPI 1760107932 CMS profile 11410552

2001 W Orange Grove Rd Ste 104, Tucson, AZ 85704

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,901

181 records reported · program years 2023–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2023–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jamie Hoang of Tucson, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,901 across 181 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 85th percentile of Physician Assistant, Medical profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,377 111
2024 General $1,491 69
2023 General $33 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jamie Hoang
  • Physician Assistant, Medical median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant, Medical
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jamie Hoang were reported at $2,377. Among 16,675 Physician Assistant, Medical profiles paid that year, the median was $214 and the middle half received between $62 and $755.

Show as a table
Year Jamie Hoang Physician Assistant, Medical median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $61 $19–$193 $163
2020 $0 $20 $14–$64 $114
2021 $0 $156 $41–$563 $132
2022 $0 $185 $55–$649 $149
2023 $33 $199 $58–$717 $160
2024 $1,491 $206 $62–$740 $164
2025 $2,377 $214 $62–$755 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $1,038 35 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $954 43 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $523 36 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $193 11 payments
  5. Organon LLC $169 9 payments
  6. Radius Health, Inc. $131 6 payments
  7. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $126 5 payments
  8. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC $121 5 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $102 6 payments
  10. Octapharma USA, Inc. $75 2 payments
  11. Other $467 23 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,901 181 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Bimzelx $815 28 payments
  2. RINVOQ $696 25 payments
  3. Cimzia $224 7 payments
  4. XELJANZ $193 11 payments
  5. Otezla $184 12 payments
  6. HADLIMA $169 9 payments
  7. RENFLEXIS $169 9 payments
  8. SKYRIZI $140 11 payments
  9. EVENITY $137 11 payments
  10. Tymlos $131 6 payments
  11. Other $1,313 71 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

515

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$8,672

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

8%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 50 $1,763
Gabapentin Generic 70 $1,635
Leflunomide Generic 20 $1,189
Prednisone Generic 163 $963
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 60 $864
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 41 $861
Sulfasalazine Generic 18 $389
Nabumetone Generic 19 $382
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 16 $276
Methylprednisolone Generic 14 $204

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $254
$254 — —
Cimzia
  • UCB, Inc. $224
$224 — —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $135
$135 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $118
$118 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $111
$111 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

181 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant, Medical in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record