Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

James Petre

Family Medicine East Moline, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1619973989 CMS profile 345531

306 46Th Ave, East Moline, IL 61244

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$128,050

1,007 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, James Petre of East Moline, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $128,050 across 1,007 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,088 111
2024 General $12,304 153
2023 General $16,356 124
2022 General $9,823 128
2021 General $19,325 175
2020 General $15,279 104
2019 General $52,874 212

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • James Petre
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to James Petre were reported at $2,088. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year James Petre Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $52,874 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $15,279 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $19,325 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $9,823 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $16,356 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $12,304 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,088 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $52,600 104 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $40,375 132 payments
  3. Idorsia Pharmaceuticals US Inc $13,307 26 payments
  4. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $5,371 54 payments
  5. Allergan Inc. $3,112 45 payments
  6. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $2,098 10 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $1,529 110 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,494 66 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $986 51 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $787 64 payments
  11. Other $6,391 345 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $104,313 82 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $17,775 873 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $5,598 38 payments
  4. Education $364 14 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $39,696 101 payments
  2. Prolia $34,050 47 payments
  3. EVENITY $17,858 37 payments
  4. QUVIVIQ $13,307 26 payments
  5. NEXLETOL $5,371 54 payments
  6. NEXLIZET $5,055 9 payments
  7. UBRELVY Neuroscience $2,667 21 payments
  8. INVOKANA $2,014 5 payments
  9. UBRELVY Neuroscience $844 56 payments
  10. Ozempic $724 41 payments
  11. Other $16,217 901 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 120 drugs

Part D claims

8,490

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$974,741

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

20.3%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 187 $234,391
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 205 $168,213
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 13 $95,772
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 44 $60,740
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 13 $53,200
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 60 $52,500
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 49 $37,786
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 14 $32,367
Xigduo Xr Dapaglifloz Propaned/Metformin Brand 47 $31,672
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 32 $29,672

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 120 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$92,789

Of which drugs: $4,062

Medicare patients

338

Average age 73

Services billed

1,703

139 women, 199 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 36%
Arthritis 35%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
COPD 15%
Depression 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 47 47 $3,787
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 11 568 $55

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 52 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FARXIGA
$7,649 205 —
QUVIVIQ
$2,012 12 —
QULIPTA
$196 — —
UBRELVY
$179 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$121 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 52 with Patron

Records

1,007 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record