Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

James Hoff

Internal Medicine Lodi, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1598859654 CMS profile 299650

999 S Fairmont Ave, Suite 135, Lodi, CA 95240

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$27,303

1,566 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, James Hoff of Lodi, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $27,303 across 1,566 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $25 1
2024 General $3,050 176
2023 General $3,991 219
2022 General $4,444 258
2021 General $5,564 303
2020 General $4,496 259
2019 General $5,732 350

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • James Hoff
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to James Hoff were reported at $25. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year James Hoff Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $5,732 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $4,496 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $5,564 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $4,444 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,991 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,050 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $25 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $3,066 114 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,330 118 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,315 172 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $2,288 151 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $1,561 98 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,528 80 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,392 116 payments
  8. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $950 64 payments
  9. Boston Scientific Corporation $938 8 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $924 65 payments
  11. Other $10,012 580 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $26,533 1,554 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $381 2 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $200 1 payment
  4. Education $175 8 payments
  5. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $14 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $2,301 87 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,749 135 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $1,344 98 payments
  4. XARELTO $1,332 113 payments
  5. Repatha $1,292 80 payments
  6. JARDIANCE $1,000 56 payments
  7. Prolia $991 36 payments
  8. Livalo $950 64 payments
  9. WATCHMAN $904 5 payments
  10. EVENITY $843 31 payments
  11. Other $24,083 1,394 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 131 drugs

Part D claims

7,274

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,536,919

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

29%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 179 $233,569
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 184 $187,200
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 164 $170,001
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 168 $135,363
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 136 $131,746
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 118 $127,787
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 101 $80,733
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 69 $59,923
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 39 $38,546
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 60 $34,405

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 131 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 72 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$147,905

Of which drugs: $2,300

Medicare patients

247

Average age 77

Services billed

94,608

132 women, 115 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 72%
Arthritis 45%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Heart failure 30%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Osteoporosis 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, testosterone cypionate, 1 mg J1071 Office 38 91,453 $1,555
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 47 392 $287

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 43 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$342 184 —
XIFAXAN
$230 — —
MOUNJARO
$214 179 —
Veozah
$150 — —
VRAYLAR
$134 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 43 with Patron

Records

1,566 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record