Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jack Jacoub

Hematology & Oncology Fountain Valley, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1528016318 CMS profile 23669

18111 Brookhurst St Ste 6100, Fountain Valley, CA 92708

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,683

437 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,300 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2020

Through program year 2025, Jack Jacoub of Fountain Valley, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,683 across 437 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,300 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 69th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $287 4
2024 General $105 5
2023 General $126 4
2022 General $189 4
2021 General $1,088 53
2020 General $3,168 156
2019 General $3,720 211

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jack Jacoub
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jack Jacoub were reported at $287. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Jack Jacoub Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,720 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $3,168 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $1,088 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $189 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $126 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $105 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $287 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $618 33 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $551 29 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $513 19 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $488 32 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $446 14 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $329 18 payments
  7. Eisai Inc. $316 18 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $300 20 payments
  9. Pharmacyclics LLC, An AbbVie Company $267 12 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $244 17 payments
  11. Other $4,610 225 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,438 421 payments
  2. Education $245 16 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $618 33 payments
  2. IMBRUVICA $362 11 payments
  3. Lenvima $316 18 payments
  4. OPDIVO $311 22 payments
  5. DARZALEX $301 8 payments
  6. CALQUENCE $231 13 payments
  7. XGEVA $220 9 payments
  8. FOUNDATIONONE CDX $214 8 payments
  9. FOUNDATIONONE $214 8 payments
  10. FOUNDATIONFOCUS $214 8 payments
  11. Other $8,224 418 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 10 drugs

Part D claims

175

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$349,411

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

49.7%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 13 $195,285
Privigen Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 25 $95,757
Gamunex-C Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 12 $41,536
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 12 $9,382
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 12 $6,660
Dexamethasone Generic 34 $300
Sodium Chloride 0.9 % Sodium Chloride Brand 13 $260
Prednisone Generic 16 $84
Olanzapine Generic 25 $82
Ondansetron Hcl Generic 13 $64

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 52 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$252,683

Of which drugs: $209,586

Medicare patients

228

Average age 76

Services billed

20,023

145 women, 83 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 45%
Cancer 40%
Osteoporosis 35%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Depression 25%
Atrial fibrillation 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 41 4,260 $86,783
Injection, ferumoxytol, for treatment of iron deficiency anemia, 1 mg (non-esrd use) Q0138 Office 11 7,650 $2,162
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 15 40 $42

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XOSPATA
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $35
$35 — —
JEMPERLI
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $20
$20 — —
ZEJULA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $20
$20 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

437 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record