Medical Doctor Program year 2024 Reported 2019–2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Iqbal Akhter

Rheumatology Mount Vernon, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1083719991 CMS profile 321137

1007 S.42Nd St., Bldg A Ste. 4, Mount Vernon, IL 62864

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,736

121 records reported · program years 2019–2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, Iqbal Akhter of Mount Vernon, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,736 across 121 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 45th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $99 5
2023 General $136 3
2022 General $30 2
2021 General $386 23
2020 General $176 11
2019 General $908 77

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Iqbal Akhter
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Iqbal Akhter were reported at $0. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Iqbal Akhter Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $908 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $176 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $386 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $30 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $136 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $99 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $0 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Amgen Inc. $494 27 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $389 43 payments
  3. Celgene Corporation $132 15 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $99 1 payment
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $83 4 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $82 5 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $82 5 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $70 4 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $60 4 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $53 3 payments
  11. Other $191 10 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Food and Beverage $1,736 121 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. XELJANZ $389 43 payments
  2. Otezla Inflammation $271 15 payments
  3. Enbrel Inflammation $250 12 payments
  4. Otezla Dermatology $132 15 payments
  5. Enbrel Inflammation $122 6 payments
  6. FARXIGA $99 1 payment
  7. ORENCIA $82 5 payments
  8. INFLECTRA $75 5 payments
  9. Enbrel Inflammation $71 4 payments
  10. SIMPONI ARIA $70 4 payments
  11. Other $630 34 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

1,879

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$885,104

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

37.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 37 $245,834
Simponi Golimumab Brand 32 $190,519
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 22 $163,101
Orencia Abatacept Brand 23 $130,336
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 12 $70,461
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 12 $56,309
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 551 $12,012
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 248 $7,681
Leflunomide Generic 95 $3,544
Prednisone Generic 602 $3,019

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 19 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$619,569

Of which drugs: $559,809

Medicare patients

236

Average age 73

Services billed

123,233

156 women, 80 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 35%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Osteoporosis 29%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
COPD 26%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 34 111,600 $402,820
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 21 92 $48

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $34
$34 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $32
$32 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $22
$22 — —
HUMIRA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $11
$11 37 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

121 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record