Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ioannis Skaribas

Interventional Pain Medicine Houston, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1922150945 CMS profile 1271763

11451 Katy Fwy Ste 340, Ste 340, Houston, TX 77079

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$92,174

1,340 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$886,525 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2025

Through program year 2025, Ioannis Skaribas of Houston, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $92,174 across 1,340 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $886,525 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $34,882 90
2024 General $7,661 147
2023 General $14,926 131
2022 General $7,700 599
2021 General $17,111 274
2020 General $347 16
2019 General $9,547 83

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ioannis Skaribas
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ioannis Skaribas were reported at $34,882. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Ioannis Skaribas Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $9,547 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $347 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $17,111 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $7,700 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $14,926 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $7,661 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $34,882 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $48,496 1,131 payments
  2. Nalu Medical, Inc. $27,694 97 payments
  3. Eminent Spine, LLC $6,317 2 payments
  4. Painteq LLC $6,197 5 payments
  5. Nevro Corp. $1,861 53 payments
  6. Medtronic, Inc. $377 7 payments
  7. Medtronic USA, Inc. $342 8 payments
  8. SI-BONE, Inc. $231 4 payments
  9. Vertiflex, Inc. $196 15 payments
  10. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $105 2 payments
  11. Other $360 16 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $31,395 21 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $22,976 1,268 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $19,533 36 payments
  4. Education $6,852 5 payments
  5. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $4,173 5 payments
  6. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $3,829 3 payments
  7. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $3,392 1 payment
  8. Entertainment $25 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nalu Neurostimulation System $27,694 97 payments
  2. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $22,616 677 payments
  3. Neuromodulation Dspsbls and Accs $7,385 8 payments
  4. PAINTEQ $6,197 5 payments
  5. Proclaim IPG $5,503 181 payments
  6. Eminent Spine SI Screw System $5,000 1 payment
  7. Proclaim DRG IPG $3,782 7 payments
  8. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $1,466 10 payments
  9. Prodigy Family of SCS IPGs $1,313 60 payments
  10. PROCLAIM Structural Heart $1,231 9 payments
  11. Other $8,665 283 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

1,476

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$22,882

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

52.2%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 632 $10,075
Oxymorphone Hcl Er Oxymorphone Hcl Brand 12 $4,615
Cephalexin Generic 155 $1,152
Gabapentin Generic 106 $1,065
Acetaminophen-Codeine Acetaminophen With Codeine Brand 50 $950
Butalb-Acetaminoph-Caff-Codein Butalbit/Acetamin/Caff/Codeine Brand 11 $647
Celecoxib Generic 42 $606
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 40 $518
Pregabalin Generic 86 $515
Hydromorphone Hcl Generic 38 $495

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$367,040

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

279

Average age 74

Services billed

2,214

169 women, 110 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Depression 33%
Diabetes 30%
Osteoporosis 23%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Heart failure 19%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

1,340 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record