Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Huma Sohail

Rheumatology Gainesville, GA Medical Doctor

NPI 1053527275 CMS profile 183567

700 S Enota Dr Ne, Gainesville, GA 30501

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,549

779 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Huma Sohail of Gainesville, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,549 across 779 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 77th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,417 112
2024 General $2,791 148
2023 General $2,456 139
2022 General $2,414 141
2021 General $1,603 113
2020 General $293 19
2019 General $1,574 107

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Huma Sohail
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Huma Sohail were reported at $2,417. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Huma Sohail Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,574 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $293 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,603 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,414 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,456 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,791 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,417 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,250 263 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,637 105 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,158 65 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $1,073 63 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $861 54 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $830 46 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $813 36 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $471 20 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $358 20 payments
  10. Horizon Therapeutics plc $287 14 payments
  11. Other $1,811 93 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,438 775 payments
  2. Education $111 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,941 190 payments
  2. COSENTYX Dermatology $1,054 65 payments
  3. Cimzia $888 54 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $829 41 payments
  5. ORENCIA $807 45 payments
  6. COSENTYX Immunology $710 48 payments
  7. XELJANZ $708 43 payments
  8. TREMFYA $663 27 payments
  9. Otezla $432 22 payments
  10. OFEV $413 16 payments
  11. Other $5,686 316 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 54 drugs

Part D claims

4,842

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$3,740,823

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

24.2%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 106 $761,753
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 75 $600,727
Otezla Apremilast Brand 98 $523,919
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 73 $478,347
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 79 $462,311
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 50 $299,239
Cosentyx Sensoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 14 $169,368
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 17 $155,302
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 17 $73,412
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 11 $72,913

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 54 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 74 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$972,104

Of which drugs: $869,625

Medicare patients

385

Average age 72

Services billed

65,400

292 women, 93 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Osteoporosis 29%
Diabetes 28%
Depression 25%
Heart failure 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 41 10,122 $343,355
Injection, rituximab, 10 mg J9312 Office 21 2,404 $147,118
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 39 15,515 $139,089
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 12 15,273 $71,693
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 15 10,400 $37,664
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 18 1,200 $25,006
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 19 566 $129
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 13 800 $82

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$618 73 —
COSENTYX
$406 31 —
SKYRIZI
$385 — —
Cimzia
$170 11 10,400
TREMFYA
$151 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

779 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record