Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Howard Terebelo

Medical Oncology Ann Arbor, MI Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1457395444 CMS profile 338526

1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$46,949

118 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$11,266

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$634,071 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Howard Terebelo of Ann Arbor, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $46,949 across 118 general payments and $11,266 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $634,071 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $125 2
2024 General $3,023 2
2023 General $6,144 12
2022 General $12,561 14
2021 General $10,352 10
2020 General $2,590 4
2020 Research $1,100 1
2019 General $12,154 74
2019 Research $10,166 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Howard Terebelo
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Howard Terebelo were reported at $125. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Howard Terebelo Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $12,154 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $2,590 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $10,352 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $12,561 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $6,144 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $3,023 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $125 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Celgene Corporation $14,207 14 payments
  2. ADC Therapeutics America, Inc. $11,197 7 payments
  3. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $5,291 9 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $3,041 3 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,914 16 payments
  6. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $2,900 4 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $2,492 3 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $2,175 1 payment
  9. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,378 8 payments
  10. Kite Pharma, Inc. $268 3 payments
  11. Other $1,087 50 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $26,332 16 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $16,103 6 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $3,243 93 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $858 1 payment
  5. Education $413 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Revlimid Hematology / Oncology $3,169 2 payments
  2. SARCLISA $3,023 2 payments
  3. NINLARO $2,890 3 payments
  4. VENCLEXTA $2,475 2 payments
  5. ABECMA $2,415 1 payment
  6. SCEMBLIX $2,363 1 payment
  7. TECVAYLI $975 1 payment
  8. IMBRUVICA $483 7 payments
  9. Revlimid Hematology $403 1 payment
  10. DARZALEX $229 4 payments
  11. Other $2,111 91 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Celgene Corporation $10,166 1 payment
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,100 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

259

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$520,841

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

42.5%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 15 $279,006
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 11 $173,876
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 33 $39,810
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 11 $10,836
Spiriva Handihaler Tiotropium Bromide Brand 13 $6,699
Anastrozole Generic 85 $5,020
Symbicort Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 13 $3,071
Hydroxyurea Generic 28 $1,640
Acyclovir Generic 23 $528
Venlafaxine Hcl Er Venlafaxine Hcl Brand 14 $309

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 8 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$7,509

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

55

Average age 74

Services billed

84

22 women, 33 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Atrial fibrillation 33%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Heart failure 22%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SARCLISA
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $3,023
$3,023 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

120 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record