Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Hollis Nipe

Internal Medicine Watertown, SD Medical Doctor

NPI 1821056896 CMS profile 642960

506 1St Ave Se, Watertown, SD 57201

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,787

278 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Hollis Nipe of Watertown, SD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,787 across 278 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $616 34
2024 General $806 53
2023 General $842 70
2022 General $442 32
2021 General $727 63
2020 General $194 15
2019 General $159 11

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Hollis Nipe
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Hollis Nipe were reported at $616. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Hollis Nipe Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $159 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $194 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $727 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $442 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $842 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $806 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $616 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $627 39 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $489 34 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $365 41 payments
  4. Grifols USA, LLC $335 22 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $334 25 payments
  6. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $251 26 payments
  7. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $150 10 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $135 8 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $110 6 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $109 8 payments
  11. Other $882 59 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,787 278 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $476 27 payments
  2. MOUNJARO $364 23 payments
  3. Prolastin-C Liquid $335 22 payments
  4. NURTEC ODT $307 35 payments
  5. QULIPTA $277 15 payments
  6. EVENITY $269 19 payments
  7. XARELTO $251 26 payments
  8. Prolia $187 14 payments
  9. ELIQUIS $141 14 payments
  10. ZAVZPRET $138 17 payments
  11. Other $2,740 212 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 177 drugs

Part D claims

11,429

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$964,863

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 210 $139,667
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 177 $94,290
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 71 $91,851
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 93 $71,718
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 87 $48,582
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 12 $41,858
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 88 $41,570
Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl Brand 16 $40,736
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 42 $36,324
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 49 $34,320

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 177 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 221 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$397,343

Of which drugs: $183,337

Medicare patients

722

Average age 74

Services billed

38,770

395 women, 327 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 43%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Diabetes 29%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Depression 26%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
Cancer 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 23 1,980 $39,747
Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg J1439 Office 13 17,000 $14,295
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 21 21 $1,718
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 16 35 $18
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 36 66 $7
Injection, gadobutrol, 0.1 ml A9585 Office 13 14 $3

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $76
$76 — —
INJECTAFER
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $66
$66 — 17,000
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $61
$61 22 —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $57
$57 12 —
Prolastin-C Liquid
  • Grifols USA, LLC $49
$49 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

278 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in South Dakota

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record